Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32317003›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2020

The scope of tobacco cessation randomized controlled trials in low- to middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review.

Navin Kumar, Jessica Ainooson, Ameera Billings, Grace Chen, Lauren Cueto, Kamila Janmohamed, Jeannette Jiang, Raymond Niaura, Amy Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navin KumarHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Navin.kumar@yale.edu.
Jessica AinoosonHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ameera BillingsHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Grace ChenHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lauren CuetoHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kamila JanmohamedHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jeannette JiangHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Raymond NiauraDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY, USA.
Amy ZhangHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USYork University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco consumption is the leading cause of preventable death globally. The global mortality burden of tobacco use lies predominantly in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). There is much evidence on the effectiveness of tobacco cessation RCTs in high-income nations. However, the evidence base in LMICs is far more limited. To effectively design randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that mitigate tobacco-related harms in LMICs, further understanding of RCTs in this environment will be helpful. We will provide quality evidence regarding the scope of tobacco cessation RCTs in LMICs.

methodsA scoping review of tobacco cessation RCTs will be conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science and Sociological Abstracts will be searched to capture current literature. We will review RCTs that have already been done on tobacco cessation in the LMICs. The key outcome will be tobacco cessation in adults. Examples of the key outcome include smoking abstinence and reduction of tobacco use. Study selection will conform to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and study quality assessed with a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration's instrument. DISCUSSION: As researchers attempt to minimize the harms from tobacco in LMICs, they need to be aware of scientific evidence to develop RCTs to achieve their aim. The review will complement the evidence base on tobacco cessation in LMICs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesTobacco Use CessationAdultHumansIncomePovertyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicScoping Reviews as TopicAbstinenceCessationLow- to middle-income countriesTobacco

Identifiers

PMID32317003
PMCPMC7171801
OpenAlexW3016450861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.