Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32316995›Full record

Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2020

The Nordic maintenance care program: maintenance care reduces the number of days with pain in acute episodes and increases the length of pain free periods for dysfunctional patients with recurrent and persistent low back pain - a secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Andreas Eklund, Jan Hagberg, Irene Jensen, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Alice Kongsted, Peter Lövgren, Mattias Jonsson, Jakob Petersen-Klingberg, Christian Calvert, Iben Axén

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01539863 (Chiropractic Maintenance Care of Persistent or Recurrent Low Back Pain. A Randomized Controlled Trial With 1 Year Follow up), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01539863 nacompletednot on this map

Chiropractic Maintenance Care of Persistent or Recurrent Low Back Pain. A Randomized Controlled Trial With 1 Year Follow up

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2012 to 2016Enrolled328ConditionsRecurrent Low Back Pain, Persistent Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back PainArmsmaintenance care, Treatment as needed
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. When there is little or no research evidence: a clinical decision tool.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas EklundKarolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden. andreas.eklund@ki.se.
Jan HagbergKarolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
Irene JensenKarolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotte Leboeuf-YdeInstitute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Alice KongstedNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark.
Peter LövgrenPrivate practice, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias JonssonPrivate practice, Lidköping, Sweden.
Jakob Petersen-KlingbergPrivate practice, Borlänge, Sweden.
Christian CalvertPrivate practice, Falkenberg, Sweden.
Iben AxénKarolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SENordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik · DKSjukhuset i Lidköping · SEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent study showed that chiropractic patients had fewer days with bothersome (activity-limiting) low back pain (LBP) when receiving care at regular pre-planned intervals regardless of symptoms ('maintenance care', MC) compared to receiving treatment only with a new episode of LBP. Benefit varied across psychological subgroups. The aims of this study were to investigate 1) pain trajectories around treatments, 2) recurrence of new episodes of LBP, and 3) length of consecutive pain-free periods and total number of pain-free weeks, for all study participants as well as for each psychological subgroup.

methodsA secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of patients (n = 319) seeking chiropractic care for recurrent or persistent LBP used 52 weekly estimates of days with bothersome (activity-limiting) LBP. First, a generalized estimating equations analysis was used to compare the pain trajectory before and after the initial treatment in every new treatment period. Thereafter, a time-to-event analysis (using Cox regression) estimated time to/risk of a new LBP episode. The analyses were performed on i) all study participants and ii) separately for each psychological sub-group (named adaptive copers, interpersonally distressed and dysfunctional) classified by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory.

resultsPatients receiving MC had flat pain trajectories around each new treatment period and reported fewer days with pain compared to patients receiving the control intervention. The entire effect was attributed to the dysfunctional subgroup who reported fewer days with activity limiting pain within each new LBP episode as well as longer total pain-free periods between episodes with a difference of 9.8 weeks (CI 95% 3.3, 16.3) compared to the control group. There were no differences in the time to/risk of a new episode of LBP in either of the subgroups.

conclusionData support the use of MC in a stratified care model targeting dysfunctional patients for MC. For a carefully selected group of patients with recurrent and persistent LBP the clinical course becomes more stable and the number of pain-free weeks between episodes increases when receiving MC. Understanding how subgroups of patients are likely to be affected by MC may help align patients' and clinicians' expectations based on realistic outcomes.

trial registrationClinical trials.gov; NCT01539863; February 22, 2012.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLong-Term CareLow Back PainMaleManipulation, ChiropracticMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultChiropracticDoseEffectLow back painMaintenance careManual treatmentPreventionSecondary preventionTertiary preventionTiming

Identifiers

PMID32316995
PMCPMC7171853
OpenAlexW3016778369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.