Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32316970›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Effect of centralization on geographic accessibility of maternity hospitals in Finland.

Tiina Huotari, Jarmo Rusanen, Timo Keistinen, Tero Lähderanta, Leena Ruha, Mikko J Sillanpää, Harri Antikainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regionalization of neonatal care: benefits, barriers, and beyond.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiina HuotariGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. tiina.huotari@oulu.fi.
Jarmo RusanenGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Timo KeistinenMinistry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland, PO Box 33, FI-00023 Government, Helsinki, Finland.
Tero LähderantaResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Leena RuhaResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mikko J SillanpääResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Harri AntikainenGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

Strategic Research Council 312705Terveyden Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 266314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past two decades, the number of maternity hospitals in Finland has been reduced from 42 to 22. Notwithstanding the benefits of centralization for larger units in terms of increased safety, the closures will inevitably impair geographical accessibility of services.

methodsThis study aimed to employ a set of location-allocation methods to assess the potential impact on accessibility, should the number of maternity hospitals be reduced from 22 to 16. Accurate population grid data combined with road network and hospital facilities data is analyzed with three different location-allocation methods: straight, sequential and capacitated p-median.

resultsDepending on the method used to assess the impact of further reduction in the number of maternity hospitals, 0.6 to 2.7% of mothers would have more than a two-hour travel time to the nearest maternity hospital, while the corresponding figure is 0.5 in the current situation. The analyses highlight the areas where the number of births is low, but a maternity hospital is still important in terms of accessibility, and the areas where even one unit would be enough to take care of a considerable volume of births.

conclusionsEven if the reduction in the number of hospitals might not drastically harm accessibility at the level of the entire population, considerable changes in accessibility can occur for clients living close to a maternity hospital facing closure. As different location-allocation analyses can result in different configurations of hospitals, decision-makers should be aware of their differences to ensure adequate accessibility for clients, especially in remote, sparsely populated areas.

Indexed as

Centralized Hospital ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, MaternityChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFinlandHealth Care ReformHealth Facility ClosureHumansInfantInformation SystemsPregnancyTravelAccessibilityCapacitated location-allocationGeographic information systemHealth care reformMaternity hospitalsp-median

Identifiers

PMID32316970
PMCPMC7171856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.