Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32316383›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

Fold-Change-Specific Enrichment Analysis (FSEA): Quantification of Transcriptional Response Magnitude for Functional Gene Groups.

Daniil S Wiebe, Nadezhda A Omelyanchuk, Aleksei M Mukhin, Ivo Grosse, Sergey A Lashin, Elena V Zemlyanskaya, Victoria V Mironova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary Transcriptomics of Cancer Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniil S WiebeInstitute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-1127
Nadezhda A OmelyanchukInstitute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Aleksei M MukhinInstitute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1102-0934
Ivo GrosseInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-4825
Sergey A LashinInstitute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3138-381X
Elena V ZemlyanskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Victoria V MironovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3438-0147
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUNovosibirsk State University · RUGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression profiling data contains more information than is routinely extracted with standard approaches. Here we present Fold-Change-Specific Enrichment Analysis (FSEA), a new method for functional annotation of differentially expressed genes from transcriptome data with respect to their fold changes. FSEA identifies Gene Ontology (GO) terms, which are shared by the group of genes with a similar magnitude of response, and assesses these changes. GO terms found by FSEA are fold-change-specifically (e.g., weakly, moderately, or strongly) affected by a stimulus under investigation. We demonstrate that many responses to abiotic factors, mutations, treatments, and diseases occur in a fold-change-specific manner. FSEA analyses suggest that there are two prevailing responses of functionally-related gene groups, either weak or strong. Notably, some of the fold-change-specific GO terms are invisible by classical algorithms for functional gene enrichment, Singular Enrichment Analysis (SEA), and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). These are GO terms not enriched compared to the genome background but strictly regulated by a factor within specific fold-change intervals. FSEA analysis of a cancer-related transcriptome suggested that the gene groups with a tightly coordinated response can be the valuable source to search for possible regulators, markers, and therapeutic targets in oncogenic processes. Availability and Implementation: FSEA is implemented as the FoldGO Bioconductor R package and a web-server.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyTranscriptomeBiomarkersComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticHumansBiomarkersenrichment analysisgene expressiongene ontologytranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32316383
PMCPMC7230499
OpenAlexW3013332389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.