Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32316251›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Validity and Internal Consistency of the Preschool-FLAT, a New Tool for the Assessment of Food Literacy in Young Children from the Training-To-Health Project.

Garden Tabacchi, Giuseppe Battaglia, Giuseppe Messina, Antonio Paoli, Antonio Palma, Marianna Bellafiore

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutrition and Food Literacy in the MENA Region: A Review to Inform Nutrition Research and Policy Makers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Garden TabacchiDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7619-5153
Giuseppe BattagliaDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7758-7175
Giuseppe MessinaDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Antonio PaoliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-4229
Antonio PalmaDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Marianna BellafioreDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90144 Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of assessing "food literacy" since youth has been highlighted and, to this purpose, valid and consistent instruments are needed. This study aimed to assess the validity and internal consistency of the preschool-FLAT (Food Literacy Assessment Tool).

methods505 children from 21 kindergartens, recruited within the Training-to-Health Project in Palermo (Italy), underwent oral sessions and activities on food-related aspects. Their knowledge/skills were recorded in the preschool-FLAT. The following scale measures were assessed: Content validity; internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha coefficients); construct validity (Structural Equation Modeling-SEM); discriminant validity (intervention subgroup of 100 children vs. control group of 27 children).

resultsAcceptable content validity of a 16-items scale and overall adequate internal consistency were revealed: Content validity index (CVI) 0.94, content validity ratio (CVR) 0.88, Chronbach's alpha 0.76. The SEM revealed a 4-factor model fitting the data well (comparative fit index 0.939, root mean square error of approximation 0.033). Discriminant validity was good (intervention group scoring higher than control,

conclusionThe preschool-FLAT revealed good psychometric properties, adequate validity and internal consistency. This is the only instrument in the literature specifically targeted to 3-6 years old children that could be effectively used to assess food literacy.

Indexed as

FoodHealth LiteracySurveys and QuestionnairesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansItalyLatent Class AnalysisMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsassessmentconsistencyfood literacypreschool educationstructural equation modelingvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32316251
PMCPMC7215692
OpenAlexW3016899872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.