Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32316171›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Fostering Health Literacy Responsiveness in a Remote Primary Health Care Setting: A Pilot Study.

Rachael Laing, Sandra C Thompson, Shandell Elmer, Rohan L Rasiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Potentially Preventable Rural Hospitalisations: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachael LaingWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Karratha, WA 6714, Australia.
Sandra C ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-7155
Shandell ElmerCentre for Global Health and Equity, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9757-9976
Rohan L RasiahWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Karratha, WA 6714, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-822X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary healthcare organisations have an important role in addressing health literacy as this is a barrier to accessing and utilising health care. Until recently, no organisational development tool operationalising health literacy in an Australian context existed. This research evaluated the efficacy of the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness (Org-HLR) tool and associated assessment process in a primary healthcare organisation in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. This study utilised a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design incorporating the collection and analysis of data in two phases: (1) Pre- and post-survey data and; (2) seven semi-structured interviews. Survey results showed that participants' confidence in core health literacy concepts improved from baseline following the intervention. Analysis of the interview data revealed participants' initial understanding of health literacy was limited, and this impeded organisational responsiveness to health literacy needs. Participants reported the workshop and tool content were relevant to their organisation; they valued involving members from all parts of the organisation and having an external facilitator to ensure the impartiality of the process. External barriers to improving their internal organisational health literacy responsiveness were identified, with participants acknowledging the management style and culture of open communication within the organisation as enablers of change. Participants identified actionable changes to improve their organisational health literacy responsiveness using the process of organisational assessment and change.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPrimary Health CareAustraliaHumansPilot ProjectsRural PopulationWestern Australiaenvironmental health literacyhealth literacyhealth literacy capacity buildinghealth literacy responsivenessprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID32316171
PMCPMC7215686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.