ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
The Development of Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL): A Study Using Delphi Method.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of Physical Literacy Assessments Designed for School Children: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Pooled it
- Physical Literacy Assessment Tools: A Systematic Literature Review for Why, What, Who, and How.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the Physical Literacy Self-Description (PLSD) Questionnaire Among Children.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- No or low self-reported moderate to vigorous physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents: a large-scale cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Developing the Spanish Physical Literacy Assessment for Children (SPLA-C): a delphi-based model for assessing physical literacy in schoolchildren aged 6-12 years.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Development of the physical education knowledge questionnaire-Spain (PEKQ-S): feasibility, validity and reliability for Spanish children aged 6-12 years.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a physical literacy assessment questionnaire for college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Perceived physical literacy instruments for sports club coaches: further differentiated validation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Global Insights and Key Trends in Physical Literacy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review from 2007 to 2024.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- The construction of a physical literacy assessment index system for junior high school students: a Chinese study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Validation of the PL-C Quest in China: understanding the pictorial physical literacy self-report scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- "Track style" children's fundamental movement skills test: construction and verification of an efficient evaluation system.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Effects of intervention integrating physical literacy into active school recesses on physical fitness and academic achievement in Chinese children.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2023Article
- Measuring physical literacy for an evidence-based approach: Validation of the French perceived physical literacy instrument for emerging adults.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2023Article
- Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment for adolescents (15-18 years): validation using confirmatory factor and composite analyses.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- The Chinese assessment of physical literacy: Based on grounded theory paradigm for children in grades 3-6.PloS one · 2022Article
- Establishment of a no-notice drill mode evaluation system for public health emergencies.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to introduce the development of the Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL), to present the theoretical model of the CAEPL, and to quantify the weight of each domain of the CAEPL. 34 experts took part in the Delphi survey, and 23 experts completed all the three rounds of the survey. Experts' opinions are used to develop the theoretical model of the CAEPL. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was employed for determining the weights of subdomains and items of the CAEPL. The CAEPL is a comprehensive model, including intention of physical activity (IPA), knowledge of physical activity (KPA), motor/sport skill (MSS), behavior of physical activity (BPA) and physical fitness (PF). Specific weights of IPA, KPA, MSS, BPA and PF are 17.25%, 16.23%, 27.01%, 23.72% and 15.79%, respectively. The CAEPL provides an important and useful instrument to measure and improve physical literacy (PL) among young Chinese people. Studies on the feasibility, reliability, validity and sensitivity of the CAEPL should be conducted to improve it in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.