Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32315594›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2020

Predation risks of signalling and searching: bats prefer moving katydids.

Inga Geipel, Ciara E Kernan, Amber S Litterer, Gerald G Carter, Rachel A Page, Hannah M Ter Hofstede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inga GeipelSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama.
Ciara E KernanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama.
Amber S LittererSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama.
Gerald G CarterSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama.
Rachel A PageSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama.
Hannah M Ter HofstedeSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males signalling their attractiveness to females are at risk from predators that exploit mating signals to detect and locate prey. Signalling, however, is not the only risky activity in sexual interactions: mate searching can incur risk as well. Male Neotropical pseudophylline katydids produce both acoustic and vibrational signals (tremulations). Females reply to male signals with tremulations of their own, and both sexes walk to find one another. We asked if movement increases predation risk, and whether tremulation or walking was more attractive to predators. We offered the Neotropical gleaning bat

Indexed as

ChiropteraAcousticsAnimalsFemaleMalePredatory BehaviorReproductionbatsforagingkatydidsprey detectionprey movementprey signals

Identifiers

PMID32315594
PMCPMC7211453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.