Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32315585›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Greater variability in chimpanzee (

Alex R DeCasien, Chet C Sherwood, Steven J Schapiro, James P Higham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Are there sex differences in the variability of fasting metabolism?Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Greater variability in rhesus macaque (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex R DeCasienDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Chet C SherwoodDepartment of Anthropology and Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Steven J SchapiroDepartment of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA.
James P HighamDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The National Center for Chimpanzee CareU42OD011197 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ABEE, CHRISTIAN R · 2012 to 2019
$19.7M
A National Chimpanzee Brain ResourceR24NS092988 · NINDS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, CHESTER · 2015 to 2018
$969k
NIH HHS U42 OD011197NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS092988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the animal kingdom, males tend to exhibit more behavioural and morphological variability than females, consistent with the 'greater male variability hypothesis'. This may reflect multiple mechanisms operating at different levels, including selective mechanisms that produce and maintain variation, extended male development, and X chromosome effects. Interestingly, human neuroanatomy shows greater male variability, but this pattern has not been demonstrated in any other species. To address this issue, we investigated sex-specific neuroanatomical variability in chimpanzees by examining relative and absolute surface areas of 23 cortical sulci across 226 individuals (135F/91M), using permutation tests of the male-to-female variance ratio of residuals from MCMC generalized linear mixed models controlling for relatedness. We used these models to estimate sulcal size heritability, simulations to assess the significance of heritability, and Pearson correlations to examine inter-sulcal correlations. Our results show that: (i) male brain structure is relatively more variable; (ii) sulcal surface areas are heritable and therefore potentially subject to selection; (iii) males exhibit lower heritability values, possibly reflecting longer development; and (iv) males exhibit stronger inter-sulcal correlations, providing indirect support for sex chromosome effects. These results provide evidence that greater male neuroanatomical variability extends beyond humans, and suggest both evolutionary and developmental explanations for this phenomenon.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainFemaleMalePan troglodyteschimpanzeesneuroanatomysexual selectionvariability

Identifiers

PMID32315585
PMCPMC7211446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.