Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32315340›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Using the Bayesian credible subgroups method to identify populations benefiting from treatment: An application to the Look AHEAD trial.

Anna Coonan, Patrick Schnell, Joel Smith, John Forbes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna CoonanGraduate Entry Medical School, The University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7514-1703
Patrick SchnellDivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Joel SmithNuffield Department of Population Health, The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
John ForbesGraduate Entry Medical School, The University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8255-3762

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-BRC-1215-20008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, subgroup analyses are used to assess whether patient characteristics moderate treatment effectiveness with general disregard for issues of multiplicity. Using data from The Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) trial in the United States, we aim to identify a subgroup where all of its types of members experience a treatment benefit defined as reducing the likelihood of a major cardiovascular event under an intensive lifestyle and weight-loss intervention. We apply the credible subgroups method to a Bayesian logistic model with a conservative prior that is sceptical of large treatment effect heterogeneity. The covariate profiles for which there is sufficient evidence of treatment benefit are, coarsely, middle-aged women, in poor subjective general health and with moderately to poorly controlled diabetes. There is at least 80% posterior probability that the conditional average treatment effect is positive for all covariate profiles fitting this description, which account for 0.5% of trial participants. Conversely, the covariate profiles that are likely to be associated with no benefit are middle aged and older men in excellent subjective general health, with well-controlled diabetes. These profiles apply to less than 2% of trial participants. More information is required to determine treatment benefit or no benefit for the remainder of the trial population.

Indexed as

AgedBayes TheoremCardiovascular DiseasesDatabases, FactualDatasets as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32315340
PMCPMC7173866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.