ArticlePloS one2020
Dysregulated activities of proline-specific enzymes in septic shock patients (sepsis-2).
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The serum amino acid profile in COVID-19.Amino acids · 2021Trial
- Uncovering the Targets of Pueraria Associated with Programmed Cell Death and the Construction of a Diagnostic Model in Septic Cardiomyopathy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Combination of machine learning and protein‑protein interaction network established one ATM‑DPP4‑TXN ferroptotic diagnostic model with experimental validation.Molecular medicine reports · 2025Article
- Higher circulating ACE2 and DPP3 but reduced ACE and angiotensinogen in hyperreninemic sepsis patients.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of mFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Impaired angiotensin II signaling in septic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Prolyl Carboxypeptidase Activity Is Present in Human Adipose Tissue and Is Elevated in Serum of Obese Men with Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Proline-specific peptidase activities (DPP4, PRCP, FAP and PREP) in plasma of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2022Article
- Relationship between Dynamic Changes of Microcirculation Flow, Tissue Perfusion Parameters, and Lactate Level and Mortality of Septic Shock in ICU.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- DDX3X mRNA Expression in T Cells Is Associated with the Severity and Mortality of Septic Patients.Disease markers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proline-specific enzymes dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), prolylcarboxypeptidase (PRCP), fibroblast activation protein α (FAP) and prolyl oligopeptidase (PREP) are known for their involvement in the immune system and blood pressure regulation. Only very limited information is currently available on their enzymatic activity and possible involvement in patients with sepsis and septic-shock. The activity of the enzymes was measured in EDTA-plasma of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU): 40 septic shock patients (sepsis-2) and 22 ICU control patients after major intracranial surgery. These data were used to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A survival analysis (at 90 days) and an association study with other parameters was performed. PRCP (day 1) and PREP (all days) enzymatic activities were higher in septic shock patients compared to controls. In contrast, FAP and DPP4 were lower in these patients on all studied time points. Since large differences were found, ROC curves were generated and these yielded area under the curve (AUC) values for PREP, FAP and DPP4 of 0.88 (CI: 0.80-0.96), 0.94 (CI: 0.89-0.99) and 0.86 (CI: 0.77-0.95), respectively. PRCP had a lower predicting value with an AUC of 0.71 (CI: 0.58-0.83). A nominally significant association was observed between survival and the DPP4 enzymatic activity at day 1 (p<0.05), with a higher DPP4 activity being associated with an increase in survival. All four enzymes were dysregulated in septic shock patients. DPP4, FAP and PREP are good in discriminating between septic shock patients and ICU controls and should be further explored to see whether they are already dysregulated in earlier stages, opening perspectives for their further investigation as biomarkers in sepsis. DPP4 also shows potential as a prognostic biomarker. Additionally, the associations found warrant further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.