ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association of Health Conditions and Health Service Utilization With Intimate Partner Violence Identified via Routine Screening Among Middle-Aged and Older Women.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Health effects associated with exposure to intimate partner violence against women and childhood sexual abuse: a burden of proof study.Nature medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Use and experience of intimate partner violence and coercive control among veterans in primary care: A latent class analysis.Psychological services · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Correlates of Social Risks and Receipt of Resources Among Rural and Urban Veterans.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- The Influence of Substance Use, Mental Health Symptoms, and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Severity on Treatment Utilization Among Women Who Experience IPV.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2026Article
- Mental and physical health outcomes among intimate partner violence survivors in Taiwan: A nationwide registry-based case control study.World journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- The intersection of domestic abuse and menopause: a scoping review.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Partner Violence and Substance-Related Service Use: Differences by HIV Status Among Women.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Examining Mental Health Outcomes of Intimate Partner Violence Among Female Survivors in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Veterans' Digital Needs.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Screening for Elder Abuse in the Veterans Health Administration: Varied Approaches Across a National Health System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Implementation and Impact of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Expansion in the Veterans Health Administration: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Intimate Partner Violence, Mental Health, and Aging-Related Health Among Men and Women Veterans Across the Lifespan.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Associations of history of intimate partner violence with mental ill-health and lifestyle factors in middle-aged and older men and women in South Africa.Archives of gerontology and geriatrics · 2024Article
- Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire to Assess Attitudes Towards Invisible Gender-Based Violence (Q-AIGV).Journal of nursing management · 2024Observational
- Screening for Intimate Partner Violence Experience and Use in the Veterans Health Administration.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Suicidal Behaviour as an Emerging Factor in Female Victims of Gender-Based Violence within a Relationship: An Exploratory Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Questionnaire for the Detection of Invisible Violence against Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Intimate Partner Violence Screening for Women in the Veterans Health Administration: Temporal Trends from the Early Years of Implementation 2014-2020.Journal of aggression, maltreatment & trauma · 2022Article
- Mental Health, Sense of Coherence, and Interpersonal Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The US Preventive Services Task Force recently determined that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) in women who are middle-aged and older. Certain Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinics have been routinely screening women of all ages for IPV since 2014. Objectives: To examine the proportion of women older than childbearing age (ie, ≥45 years) who have positive results when routinely screened for past-year IPV at VHA clinics and to evaluate the associations of a positive screening result with health conditions and health service utilization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 4481 women aged 45 years and older who were screened for past-year IPV in 13 VHA outpatient clinics in 11 states between April 2014 and April 2016. Data analysis was conducted from March 2019 to August 2019. Exposure: Positive screening result for past-year IPV. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mental and physical health conditions (identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition [ICD-9] and ICD-10 codes from VHA medical record data) and VHA health services utilization (identified using inpatient and outpatient VHA encounter data) in the 20 months after screening. Results: In this study, 2937 of 4481 women (65.5%) were middle-aged (ie, aged 45 to 59 years), and 1544 (34.5%) were older (ie, aged ≥60 years), with 1955 (43.6%) black participants. A total of 255 middle-aged women (8.7%; mean [SD] age, 51 [4] years) and 79 older women (5.1%; mean [SD] age, 64 [5] years) screened positive for past-year IPV. In adjusted logistic regression models among middle-aged women, screening positive for IPV was associated with subsequent diagnoses of anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.50-2.70; P < .001), depression (aOR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.80-3.00; P < .001), posttraumatic stress disorder (aOR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.80-3.00; P < .001), suicidal ideation and/or behavior (aOR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.10-6.90; P < .001), and substance use disorder (aOR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.80-3.50; P < .001). Similar but attenuated associations were seen for older women (eg, substance use disorder: aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.10-4.40; P = .04). In adjusted negative binomial regression models among middle-aged women, screening positive for IPV was associated with a higher rate of subsequent psychosocial (eg, mental health) visits (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 2.40; 95% CI, 2.00-2.90; P < .001), primary care visits (aRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30; P < .001), and emergency department visits (aRR, 1.50; 95% CI 1.20-1.80; P < .001). Older women screening positive for IPV had a higher rate of psychosocial visits (aRR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.30-2.70; P < .001) but not of other visit types. Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge, this study was the largest to evaluate routine screening for IPV among women aged 45 years and older, and it found that IPV remained prevalent and was associated with morbidity for these women. Screening for IPV in women older than 44 years may improve detection and provision of evidence-based services to this growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.