Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32315032›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Systematic in vitro profiling of off-target affinity, cleavage and efficiency for CRISPR enzymes.

Liyang Zhang, H Tomas Rube, Christopher A Vakulskas, Mark A Behlke, Harmen J Bussemaker, Miles A Pufall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liyang ZhangDepartment of Biochemistry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
H Tomas RubeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Merced, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Christopher A VakulskasIntegrated DNA Technologies, Inc., 1710 Commercial Park, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Mark A BehlkeIntegrated DNA Technologies, Inc., 1710 Commercial Park, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Harmen J BussemakerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Miles A PufallDepartment of Biochemistry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Integrated DNA Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Merced · US

Funding

Core Research Computing FacilityG20RR030893 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PURDY, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2010
$10.0M
Inferring regulatory circuitry from microarray dataR01HG003008 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BUSSEMAKER, HARMEN J · 2004 to 2020
$7.0M
NCRR NIH HHS G20 RR030893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR RNA-guided endonucleases (RGEs) cut or direct activities to specific genomic loci, yet each has off-target activities that are often unpredictable. We developed a pair of simple in vitro assays to systematically measure the DNA-binding specificity (Spec-seq), catalytic activity specificity (SEAM-seq) and cleavage efficiency of RGEs. By separately quantifying binding and cleavage specificity, Spec/SEAM-seq provides detailed mechanistic insight into off-target activity. Feature-based models generated from Spec/SEAM-seq data for SpCas9 were consistent with previous reports of its in vitro and in vivo specificity, validating the approach. Spec/SEAM-seq is also useful for profiling less-well characterized RGEs. Application to an engineered SpCas9, HiFi-SpCas9, indicated that its enhanced target discrimination can be attributed to cleavage rather than binding specificity. The ortholog ScCas9, on the other hand, derives specificity from binding to an extended PAM. The decreased off-target activity of AsCas12a (Cpf1) appears to be primarily driven by DNA-binding specificity. Finally, we performed the first characterization of CasX specificity, revealing an all-or-nothing mechanism where mismatches can be bound, but not cleaved. Together, these applications establish Spec/SEAM-seq as an accessible method to rapidly and reliably evaluate the specificity of RGEs, Cas::gRNA pairs, and gain insight into the mechanism and thermodynamics of target discrimination.

Indexed as

AcidaminococcusBase PairingBase Pair MismatchCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDeltaproteobacteriaDNADNA CleavageEndodeoxyribonucleasesMutationNanog Homeobox ProteinProtein BindingRNASELEX Aptamer TechniqueSequence Analysis, DNASubstrate SpecificityCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNAEndodeoxyribonucleasesNanog Homeobox ProteinRNA

Identifiers

PMID32315032
PMCPMC7229833
OpenAlexW3017057562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.