Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314964›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Sex-determining genes distinctly regulate courtship capability and target preference via sexually dimorphic neurons.

Kenichi Ishii, Margot Wohl, Andre DeSouza, Kenta Asahina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sequencing of distinct wing behaviors duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurons Underlying Aggression-Like Actions That Are Shared by Both Males and Females inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Male-male interactions shape mate selection inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cell assembly analysis of neural circuits for innate behavior inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenichi Ishii *Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.
Margot Wohl *Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.
Andre DeSouzaMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.
Kenta AsahinaMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-4369
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JURRUS, ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Neurosciences Graduate Training ProgramT32NS061847 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Brenda L Bloodgood · 2008 to 2026
$7.7M
Genetic factors controlling the intensity of social behaviorR35GM119844 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ASAHINA, KENTA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
FluoRender: Visualization-Based and Interactive Analysis for Multichannel Microscopy DataR01EB023947 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HANSEN, CHARLES · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023947NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119844NIH HHS P40 OD018537NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For successful mating, a male animal must execute effective courtship behaviors toward a receptive target sex, which is female. Whether the courtship execution capability and upregulation of courtship toward females are specified through separable sex-determining genetic pathways remains uncharacterized. Here, we found that one of the two

Indexed as

CourtshipSex CharacteristicsAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsSexual Behavior, AnimalTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsDSX protein, Drosophilafru protein, DrosophilaNerve Tissue ProteinsTranscription Factorsaggressioncourtship behaviorD. melanogasterdoublesexfruitlessgeneticsgenomicsneurosciencesexual dimorphismsocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID32314964
PMCPMC7173972
OpenAlexW3017254924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.