ArticleClinical drug investigation2020
Comparative Study of Traditional Ablative CO
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of laser therapy combined with topical antifungal agents for onychomycosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Lasers in medical science · 2022Pooled it
- COLasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Fractional Versus Fully Ablative CODermatology practical & conceptual · 2024Article
- COSkin appendage disorders · 2024Article
- Review
- A focused review on laser- and energy-assisted drug delivery for nail disorders.Lasers in medical science · 2024Review
- Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery: A Systematic Review of Safety and Adverse Events.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Fractional COLasers in surgery and medicine · 2022Article
- Laser Treatment in Nail Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe predominance of onychomycosis has been increasing recently. New medications and treatment modalities are being researched for better saturation of the antifungal agents through the nail plate topically because of the low resilience of some patients for the oral antifungal agents. Treatment of onychomycosis, mainly moderate to severe, can be very challenging, expensive, and time consuming.
objectiveThe objective of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of a manually operated ablative CO STUDY
designWe conducted an open-label controlled prospective study of 160 eligible patients randomized into control and treatment groups with a 1:1 allocation in the department of dermatology in five different hospitals in Shanghai. It was a 6-month study where both groups were treated with a topical antifungal agent, with the treatment group also receiving ablation by the traditional CO
resultsThe clinical efficacy and mycological cure rate were significantly higher (p < 0.001) for the treatment group. Three (3.75%) patients from the control group and 18 (25%) patients from the treatment group achieved complete nail clearance along with negative potassium hydroxide and negative culture (primary endpoint) results at 24 weeks. Mycological clearance with at least moderate nail clearance (secondary endpoint) for the treatment group was also significantly higher (p < 0.001) for the laser treatment group. The laser treatment was mildly painful but tolerable by the patients. No drug interactions for both groups were encountered.
conclusionsThe ablative CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.