Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314226›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Cardiac point-of-care to cart-based ultrasound translation using constrained CycleGAN.

Mohammad H Jafari, Hany Girgis, Nathan Van Woudenberg, Nathaniel Moulson, Christina Luong, Andrea Fung, Shane Balthazaar, John Jue, Micheal Tsang, Parvathy Nair and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assisted probe guidance in cardiac ultrasound: A review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. An Overview of Deep Learning Methods for Left Ventricle Segmentation.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Learning ultrasound rendering from cross-sectional model slices for simulated training.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Risk-Stratifying COVID-19 Patients the Right Way.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad H JafariThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. mohammadj@ece.ubc.ca.
Hany GirgisThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nathan Van WoudenbergThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nathaniel MoulsonThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Christina LuongThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Andrea FungThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Shane BalthazaarThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
John JueThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Micheal TsangThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Parvathy NairThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ken GinThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Robert RohlingThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Purang AbolmaesumiThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Teresa TsangThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe emerging market of cardiac handheld ultrasound (US) is on the rise. Despite the advantages in ease of access and the lower cost, a gap in image quality can still be observed between the echocardiography (echo) data captured by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) compared to conventional cart-based US, which limits the further adaptation of POCUS. In this work, we aim to present a machine learning solution based on recent advances in adversarial training to investigate the feasibility of translating POCUS echo images to the quality level of high-end cart-based US systems.

methodsWe propose a constrained cycle-consistent generative adversarial architecture for unpaired translation of cardiac POCUS to cart-based US data. We impose a structured shape-wise regularization via a critic segmentation network to preserve the underlying shape of the heart during quality translation. The proposed deep transfer model is constrained to the anatomy of the left ventricle (LV) in apical two-chamber (AP2) echo views.

resultsA total of 1089 echo studies from 841 patients are used in this study. The AP2 frames are captured by POCUS (Philips Lumify and Clarius) and cart-based (Philips iE33 and Vivid E9) US machines. The dataset of quality translation comprises a total of 441 echo studies from 395 patients. Data from both POCUS and cart-based systems of the same patient were available in 122 cases. The deep-quality transfer model is integrated into a pipeline for an automated cardiac evaluation task, namely segmentation of LV in AP2 view. By transferring the low-quality POCUS data to the cart-based US, a significant average improvement of 30% and 34 mm is obtained in the LV segmentation Dice score and Hausdorff distance metrics, respectively.

conclusionThis paper presents the feasibility of a machine learning solution to transform the image quality of POCUS data to that of high-quality high-end cart-based systems. The experiments show that by leveraging the quality translation through the proposed constrained adversarial training, the accuracy of automatic segmentation with POCUS data could be improved.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsEchocardiographyHeartHumansMachine LearningAdversarial trainingDeep learningEchocardiographyImage translationLeft ventricular ejection fractionPoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32314226
OpenAlexW3017253860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.