ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020
Appropriate Candidates for Salvage Esophagectomy of Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conversion Therapy for cT4b and M1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Observational
- Salvage esophagectomy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Significant or not?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Prognostic impact of perioperative change in serum p53 antibody titers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023Article
- Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023Article
- Essential updates 2020/2021: Recent topics in surgery and perioperative therapy for esophageal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023Review
- Surgical strategies for treatment of clinical T4 esophageal cancer in Japan.Global health & medicine · 2021Review
- Esophageal cancer patients' survival after complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021Article
- Salvage treatment after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- Unresectable esophageal cancer treated with multiple chemotherapies in combination with chemoradiotherapy: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours' consensus guidelines for the management of oesophageal cancer.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021Article
- Salvage Esophagectomy for Residual Tumor After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invading the Neighboring Organs: Is it a Feasible Choice?Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Although salvage esophagectomy is the only curative treatment available following dCRT failure, the appropriate candidates for salvage esophagectomy remain unclear. PATIENTS AND
methodsThree hundred seventeen patients who underwent dCRT from April 2004 to December 2016 were stratified into three study groups-a complete response (CR) group, chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) group, and salvage esophagectomy group-and compared. We also investigated the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of salvage esophagectomy.
resultsSeventy-one patients (22.4%) achieved CR after dCRT, 18 patients (5.7%) underwent salvage esophagectomy, and 228 patients (71.9%) underwent palliative chemotherapy or BSC. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the CR group, salvage esophagectomy group, and chemotherapy or BSC group were 83.0%, 51.6%, and 1.3%, respectively. Salvage esophagectomy recipients had a worse OS rate than CR patients (p < 0.001) but a better OS rate than those in the chemotherapy or BSC group (p < 0.001). Incomplete resection was the only significant variable associated with poor OS on univariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis (hazard ratio: 7.633, 95% confidence interval: 1.692-34.482; p = 0.008). Patients with tumors in the upper thoracic esophagus were more likely to undergo incomplete resection (p = 0.011).
conclusionsPatients who achieve R0 resection are good candidates for salvage esophagectomy regardless of their response to dCRT. Those with upper thoracic esophageal tumors are at risk of incomplete resection; careful attention is required when considering these patients for salvage esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.