Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314071›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2020

Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: a Current Perspective.

Meera Patrawala, Jennifer Shih, Gerald Lee, Brian Vickery

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05163574 (Induction of Sustained Unresponsiveness to Peanuts Using High- and Low-dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy - Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05163574 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Induction of Sustained Unresponsiveness to Peanuts Using High- and Low-dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy - Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsPeanut AllergyArmsHigh dose OIT, Low dose OIT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. CD8Nature communications · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The rationale for development of ligelizumab in food allergy.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Eight tips for the implementation of the first licenced peanut allergy oral immunotherapy into clinical practice.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meera PatrawalaEmory University School of Medicine, 1400 Tullie Road NE 5th floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. meera.mehta@emory.edu.
Jennifer ShihEmory University School of Medicine, 1400 Tullie Road NE 5th floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Gerald LeeEmory University School of Medicine, 1400 Tullie Road NE 5th floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Brian VickeryChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, 1400 Tullie Road NE 5th floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewPeanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) is one of the most studied experimental therapies for food allergy. With the recently FDA-approved peanut product, Palforzia, the goal of this article is to review the most recent data from clinical trials, discuss recent trends, and anticipate future developments. RECENT

findingsThe latest research suggests that peanut OIT could be a promising option for peanut-allergic patients, with the majority of participants in research studies achieving the primary efficacy endpoint of desensitization, as well as sustained unresponsiveness in select populations. Some studies also showed improvements in food allergy-related quality of life. However, peanut OIT is not without risk or side effects, including potentially serious allergic reactions. Future research will need to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of the therapy in the real-world setting, predictors of important treatment outcomes, and the use of adjunctive therapies that may mitigate some of these allergic reactions.

Indexed as

Administration, OralArachisDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansImmunoglobulin EPeanut HypersensitivityQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeImmunoglobulin EDesensitizationFood allergyOral food challengeOral immunotherapyPeanut allergySustained unresponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID32314071
PMCPMC7223701
OpenAlexW3016746792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.