ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Unlocking the PACS DICOM Domain for its Use in Clinical Research Data Warehouses.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breaking data silos: incorporating the DICOM imaging standard into the OMOP CDM to enable multimodal research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Clinical Data Warehousing: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2024Article
- Successes and challenges in extracting information from DICOM image databases for audit and research.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Querying a Clinical Data Warehouse for Combinations of Clinical and Imaging Data.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Ultra-high field cardiac MRI in large animals and humans for translational cardiovascular research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical Data Warehouses (DWHs) are used to provide researchers with simplified access to pseudonymized and homogenized clinical routine data from multiple primary systems. Experience with the integration of imaging and metadata from picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), however, is rare. Our goal was therefore to analyze the viability of integrating a production PACS with a research DWH to enable DWH queries combining clinical and medical imaging metadata and to enable the DWH to display and download images ad hoc. We developed an application interface that enables to query the production PACS of a large hospital from a clinical research DWH containing pseudonymized data. We evaluated the performance of bulk extracting metadata from the PACS to the DWH and the performance of retrieving images ad hoc from the PACS for display and download within the DWH. We integrated the system into the query interface of our DWH and used it successfully in four use cases. The bulk extraction of imaging metadata required a median (quartiles) time of 0.09 (0.03-2.25) to 12.52 (4.11-37.30) seconds for a median (quartiles) number of 10 (3-29) to 103 (8-693) images per patient, depending on the extraction approach. The ad hoc image retrieval from the PACS required a median (quartiles) of 2.57 (2.57-2.79) seconds per image for the download, but 5.55 (4.91-6.06) seconds to display the first and 40.77 (38.60-41.63) seconds to display all images using the pure web-based viewer. A full integration of a production PACS with a research DWH is viable and enables various use cases in research. While the extraction of basic metadata from all images can be done with reasonable effort, the extraction of all metadata seems to be more appropriate for subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.