ArticlePediatric surgery international2020
A novel and simple machine learning algorithm for preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on the construction of an artificial intelligence model for the early diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study based on complete blood count.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionise Surgical Decision-Making for Appendectomy? A Narrative Review.Surgical innovation · 2026Review
- AI in pediatric surgery: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric general surgery: a systematic review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in acute appendicitis: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- A roadmap of artificial intelligence applications in pediatric surgery: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and ethical considerations.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Review
- Role of immature granulocyte and blood biomarkers in predicting perforated acute appendicitis using machine learning model.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine Learning-Derived Appendicitis Score in Children: A Multicenter Validation Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: Insights from a Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- External validation of predictive models for diagnosis, management and severity of pediatric appendicitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Article
- Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the emergency department: an artificial intelligence-based approach.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- An interpretable and transparent machine learning framework for appendicitis detection in pediatric patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: a narrative review.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare: A Journey through History, Present Innovations, and Future Possibilities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- [Predictive appendicitis scale for children under 4 years of age: Is it possible to apply artificial intelligence?]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of a clinical decision support system for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is a tendency toward nonoperative management of appendicitis resulting in an increasing need for preoperative diagnosis and classification. For medical purposes, simple conceptual decision-making models that can learn are widely used. Decision trees are reliable and effective techniques which provide high classification accuracy. We tested if we could detect appendicitis and differentiate uncomplicated from complicated cases using machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed all cases admitted between 2010 and 2016 that fell into the following categories: healthy controls (Group 1); sham controls (Group 2); sham disease (Group 3), and acute abdomen (Group 4). The latter group was further divided into four groups: false laparotomy; uncomplicated appendicitis; complicated appendicitis without abscess, and complicated appendicitis with abscess. Patients with comorbidities and whose complete blood count and/or pathology results were lacking were excluded. Data were collected for demographics, preoperative blood analysis, and postoperative diagnosis. Various machine learning algorithms were applied to detect appendicitis patients.
resultsThere were 7244 patients with a mean age of 6.84 ± 5.31 years, of whom 82.3% (5960/7244) were male. Most algorithms tested, especially linear methods, provided similar performance measures. We preferred the decision tree model due to its easier interpretability. With this algorithm, we detected appendicitis patients with 93.97% area under the curve (AUC), 94.69% accuracy, 93.55% sensitivity, and 96.55% specificity, and uncomplicated appendicitis with 79.47% AUC, 70.83% accuracy, 66.81% sensitivity, and 81.88% specificity.
conclusionsMachine learning is a novel approach to prevent unnecessary operations and decrease the burden of appendicitis both for patients and health systems. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32314055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.