Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314055›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2020

A novel and simple machine learning algorithm for preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

Emrah Aydin, İnan Utku Türkmen, Gözde Namli, Çiğdem Öztürk, Ayşe B Esen, Y Nur Eray, Egemen Eroğlu, Fatih Akova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. AI in pediatric surgery: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emrah AydinDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. dremrahaydin@yahoo.com.
İnan Utku TürkmenApplied Data Science, TED University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gözde NamliDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Bahcelievler State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Çiğdem ÖztürkDepartment of Pathology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ayşe B EsenDepartment of Microbiology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Y Nur ErayDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Egemen EroğluDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih AkovaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a tendency toward nonoperative management of appendicitis resulting in an increasing need for preoperative diagnosis and classification. For medical purposes, simple conceptual decision-making models that can learn are widely used. Decision trees are reliable and effective techniques which provide high classification accuracy. We tested if we could detect appendicitis and differentiate uncomplicated from complicated cases using machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed all cases admitted between 2010 and 2016 that fell into the following categories: healthy controls (Group 1); sham controls (Group 2); sham disease (Group 3), and acute abdomen (Group 4). The latter group was further divided into four groups: false laparotomy; uncomplicated appendicitis; complicated appendicitis without abscess, and complicated appendicitis with abscess. Patients with comorbidities and whose complete blood count and/or pathology results were lacking were excluded. Data were collected for demographics, preoperative blood analysis, and postoperative diagnosis. Various machine learning algorithms were applied to detect appendicitis patients.

resultsThere were 7244 patients with a mean age of 6.84 ± 5.31 years, of whom 82.3% (5960/7244) were male. Most algorithms tested, especially linear methods, provided similar performance measures. We preferred the decision tree model due to its easier interpretability. With this algorithm, we detected appendicitis patients with 93.97% area under the curve (AUC), 94.69% accuracy, 93.55% sensitivity, and 96.55% specificity, and uncomplicated appendicitis with 79.47% AUC, 70.83% accuracy, 66.81% sensitivity, and 81.88% specificity.

conclusionsMachine learning is a novel approach to prevent unnecessary operations and decrease the burden of appendicitis both for patients and health systems. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAppendectomyMachine LearningAcute DiseaseAppendicitisChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMalePreoperative PeriodAppendicitisArtificial intelligenceChildrenMachine learningNonoperative management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.