Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314044›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Costs and compensation in zooplankton pigmentation under countervailing threats of ultraviolet radiation and predation.

Samuel M Bashevkin, John H Christy, Steven G Morgan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The response of aquatic ecosystems to the interactive effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and climate change.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2020.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuel M BashevkinBodega Marine Laboratory and Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, 2099 Westshore Rd, PO Box 247, Bodega Bay, CA, 94923, USA. smbashevkin@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-7089
John H ChristySmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panamá, República de Panamá.
Steven G MorganBodega Marine Laboratory and Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, 2099 Westshore Rd, PO Box 247, Bodega Bay, CA, 94923, USA.
Marine Stewardship Council · GBSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

American Museum of Natural History Lerner-Gray Fund for Marine ResearchNational Geographic Society Young Explorer's GrantSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Short-term FellowshipUniversity of California, Davis College of Agriculture and Environmental Science Jastro Shields Graduate Research FellowshipUniversity of California, Davis Hemispheric Institute of the Americas Tinker Summer Field Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary responses to opposing directions of natural selection include trade-offs, where the phenotype balances selective forces, and compensation, where other traits reduce the impact of one selective force. Zooplankton pigmentation protects from ultraviolet radiation (UVR) but attracts visual predators. This trade-off is understudied in the ocean where planktonic larvae in surface waters face ubiquitous UVR and visual predation threats. We tested whether crab larvae can behaviorally reduce UVR risk through downward swimming or expansion of photoprotective chromatophores. Then we examined whether more pigmented larvae are more heavily predated by silverside fish under natural sunlight in the tropics in three UVR treatments (visible light, visible + UVA, visible + UVA + UVB). Lastly, we tested the behavioral chromatophore response of larvae to predation threats in two light treatments. Armases ricordi avoided surface waters after exposure to sunlight with UVR. Armases ricordi, Armases americanum, and Eurypanopeus sp. consistently expanded chromatophores in UVR or visible light, while Mithraculus sculptus and Mithraculus coryphe showed no response. Fish preferred pigmented larvae on sunnier days in visible light lacking UVR. Lastly, both M. coryphe and M. sculptus unexpectedly expanded chromatophores in fish cues, but responses were inconsistent over trials and across light treatments. The more consistent larval responses to UVR than to predator cues and the lack of predator preferences in natural light conditions suggest that UVR may have a stronger influence on pigmentation than predation. This study improves our understanding of planktonic adaptation to countervailing selection caused by visual predation and exposure to UVR.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysZooplanktonAnimalsLarvaPigmentationPredatory BehaviorSunlightBehaviorBrachyuraColor changeLarvaTrade-off

Identifiers

PMID32314044
OpenAlexW3016354241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.