Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314026›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Whole liver segmentation based on deep learning and manual adjustment for clinical use in SIRT.

Xikai Tang, Esmaeel Jafargholi Rangraz, Walter Coudyzer, Jeroen Bertels, David Robben, Georg Schramm, Wies Deckers, Geert Maleux, Kristof Baete, Chris Verslype and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical validation of the accuracy of an intra-operative assessment tool using 3D ultrasound compared to histopathology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Segmentation of liver and liver lesions using deep learning.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Deep Learning Framework for Liver Segmentation fromSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. nnU-Net Deep Learning Method for Segmenting Parenchyma and Determining Liver Volume From Computed Tomography Images.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Application of deep learning assisted electronic laryngoscope in diagnosis of laryngeal leukoplakia].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xikai TangNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. xikai.tang@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-0294
Esmaeel Jafargholi RangrazNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Walter CoudyzerRadiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen BertelsMedical Imaging Research Center (MIRC), KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
David RobbenMedical Imaging Research Center (MIRC), KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Georg SchrammNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wies DeckersNuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert MaleuxRadiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristof BaeteNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Chris VerslypeDigestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mark J GoodingMirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Christophe M DerooseNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan NuytsNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (ITN Hybrid) MSCA 764458NIH HHS 1P41EB017183-01A1 CAI2R TRDP #3Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) G082418N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), an accurate total liver segmentation is required for activity prescription and absorbed dose calculation. Our goal was to investigate the feasibility of using automatic liver segmentation based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) for CT imaging in SIRT, and the ability of CNN to reduce inter-observer variability of the segmentation.

methodsA multi-scale CNN was modified for liver segmentation for SIRT patients. The CNN model was trained with 139 datasets from three liver segmentation challenges and 12 SIRT patient datasets from our hospital. Validation was performed on 13 SIRT datasets and 12 challenge datasets. The model was tested on 40 SIRT datasets. One expert manually delineated the livers and adjusted the liver segmentations from CNN for 40 test SIRT datasets. Another expert performed the same tasks for 20 datasets randomly selected from the 40 SIRT datasets. The CNN segmentations were compared with the manual and adjusted segmentations from the experts. The difference between the manual segmentations was compared with the difference between the adjusted segmentations to investigate the inter-observer variability. Segmentation difference was evaluated through dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume ratio (RV), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD).

resultsThe CNN segmentation achieved a median DSC of 0.94 with the manual segmentation and of 0.98 with the manually corrected CNN segmentation, respectively. The DSC between the adjusted segmentations is 0.98, which is 0.04 higher than the DSC between the manual segmentations.

conclusionThe CNN model achieved good liver segmentations on CT images of good image quality, with relatively normal liver shapes and low tumor burden. 87.5% of the 40 CNN segmentations only needed slight adjustments for clinical use. However, the trained model failed on SIRT data with low dose or contrast, lesions with large density difference from their surroundings, and abnormal liver position and shape. The abovementioned scenarios were not adequately represented in the training data. Despite this limitation, the current CNN is already a useful clinical tool which improves inter-observer agreement and therefore contributes to the standardization of the dosimetry. A further improvement is expected when the CNN will be trained with more data from SIRT patients.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverNeural Networks, ComputerObserver VariationTumor BurdenConvolutional neural network (CNN)Internal dosimetryInter-observer variabilityLiver segmentationSelective internal radionuclide therapy (SIRT)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.