SynthesisWorld journal of urology2021
The impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors on mortality in a prostate cancer chemoprevention setting: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential association between cumulative dose of 5α-reductase inhibitors and mortality.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between the use of proton pump inhibitors and serum PSA levels in the general U.S. population.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Review
- 5-alpha reductase inhibitors use in prostatic disease and beyond.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to evaluate the impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARI) for prostate cancer (PCa) primary prevention on specific and overall mortality (primary outcomes), the incidence of PCa diagnosis and disease aggressiveness (secondary outcomes).
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials and BVS through April 2018 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) and cohort studies (CS). We included articles with data on mortality or PCa incidence for men using 5ARI previously to PCa diagnosis.
resultsRegarding the included studies, nine had data on mortality, 16 on PCa incidence and 12 on Gleason scores (GS). We found that the use of 5ARI had no impact on overall mortality (RR 0.93 95% CI 0.78-1.11) and PCa-related mortality (RR 1.35 95% CI 0.50-3.94), nor on high-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 1.06 95% CI 0.72-1.56). We identified a relative risk reduction of 24% in moderate-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.59-0.98) and low-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.59-0.97) Also, a reduction of 26% in overall PCa diagnosis was observed in the RCT subgroup analysis (RR 0.74 95% CI 0.65-0.84).
conclusion5ARI significantly reduced the risk of being diagnosed with PCa, not increasing high-grade disease, overall or cancer-specific mortality. Due to the relatively short mean follow-up of most studies, the mortality analysis is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.