Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32314001›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Drug prescriptions in nursing home residents: an Italian multicenter observational study.

Luca Pasina, A Novella, L Cortesi, A Nobili, M Tettamanti, A Ianes

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quality, efficacy, safety-it is not enough!European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca PasinaIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy. luca.pasina@marionegri.it.
A NovellaIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
L CortesiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
A NobiliIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
M TettamantiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
A IanesMedical Direction, Korian Italy, Milan, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePharmacoepidemiological studies aimed to distinguish drug use in nursing home (NH) residents with and without dementia could be useful to target specific interventions to improve prescribing. This multicenter retrospective study aimed (i) to describe drug therapy in a large sample of NH residents according to the diagnosis of dementia, and (ii) to record the most frequent potentially severe drug-drug interactions.

methodsThis study was conducted in a sample of Italian long-term care NHs. Drug prescription information, diseases, and socio-demographic characteristics of NH residents were collected at three different times during 2018.

resultsThe mean number of drugs was significantly higher in NH residents without dementia than in those with (p = 0.05). Antipsychotics, laxatives, benzodiazepines, antiplatelets, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were most commonly prescribed in patients with dementia, and PPIs, benzodiazepines, and laxatives in those without. The prevalence of patients with potentially severe drug-drug interactions was higher among those without dementia, 1216 (64.7%) and 518 (74.2%, p < 0.0001). There were significant differences between the mean numbers of drugs prescribed in individual NH after adjusting the analysis for age, sex, and mean Charlson index, the estimated mean number of drugs prescribed (± standard error) ranging from 5.1 (± 0.3) to 9.3 (± 0.3) in patients with dementia (p < 0.0001) and from 6.0 (± 0.7) to 10.9 (± 0.50) in those without dementia (p < 0.0001). Chronic use of psychotropic drugs was common in NH residents with and without dementia.

conclusionsThe wide variability between NHs in drug prescriptions and potentially inappropriate prescribing suggests the need to recommend a standardized approach to medication review of psychotropic drugs, antiulcer, laxatives, and antiplatelets in this complex and vulnerable population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaDrug InteractionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingItalyLaxativesMaleNursing HomesPharmacoepidemiologyAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesLaxativesProton Pump InhibitorsDementiaNursing homesPsychotropic drugs

Identifiers

PMID32314001
OpenAlexW3016992399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.