Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32313991›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2020

Exploiting the genome of Thinopyrum elongatum to expand the gene pool of hexaploid wheat.

Lauren Baker, Surbhi Grewal, Cai-Yun Yang, Stella Hubbart-Edwards, Duncan Scholefield, Stephen Ashling, Amanda J Burridge, Alexandra M Przewieslik-Allen, Paul A Wilkinson, Ian P King and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The transfer of 98% of the genome of Aegilops mutica into wheat (Triticum aestivum).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Genome-Wide Analysis ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of New Wheat-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A chromosome arm fromMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Genome-wide analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Generation of Doubled Haploid Wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren BakerSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Surbhi GrewalSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0707-2504
Cai-Yun YangSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-4230
Stella Hubbart-EdwardsSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9286-154X
Duncan ScholefieldSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Stephen AshlingSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Amanda J BurridgeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0140-5523
Alexandra M Przewieslik-AllenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
Paul A WilkinsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8836-5439
Ian P KingSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-0265
Julie KingSchool of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK. julie.king@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-7199
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004596/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageOne hundred and thirty four introgressions from Thinopyrum elongatum have been transferred into a wheat background and were characterised using 263 SNP markers. Species within the genus Thinopyrum have been shown to carry genetic variation for a very wide range of traits including biotic and abiotic stresses and quality. Research has shown that one of the species within this genus, Th. elongatum, has a close relationship with the genomes of wheat making it a highly suitable candidate to expand the gene pool of wheat. Homoeologous recombination, in the absence of the Ph1 gene, has been exploited to transfer an estimated 134 introgressions from Th. elongatum into a hexaploid wheat background. The introgressions were detected and characterised using 263 single nucleotide polymorphism markers from a 35 K Axiom

Indexed as

Gene PoolGenome, PlantPloidiesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenotypePhenotypePhysical Chromosome MappingPoaceaeSyntenyTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID32313991
PMCPMC7311493
OpenAlexW3016775215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.