ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020
[Documentation of self-reported patient outcomes in trauma surgery : Clinical benefits of patient reported outcome measures].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Trial
- A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary "Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation".Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The future progressive aspiration of evidence-based medicine makes it necessary to carry out a comprehensive documentation of functional treatment after trauma surgery. Especially the subjective, patient-centered satisfaction with treatment results will be the focus of attention. Patient centered outcome measures (PROM) are potent instruments to capture the patients' functional status validly and in a cost and time-efficient manner. Additionally, modern technical options have the potential to evaluate specific joint function even better. Parameters, such as range of motion can soon be measured by the patient using the widely spread smartphone technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32313987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.