Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32313966›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2020

[Advanced training of general and visceral surgeons in life-saving emergency surgery : Results of a survey among participants of a surgery course].

C Güsgen, F Anger, T Hauer, A Willms, H J Buhr, C-T Germer, R Schwab, J F Lock, Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Militär- und Notfallchirurgie (CAMIN) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Learning gain of an ATLSEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C GüsgenKlinik für Allgemein- Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Deutschland.
F AngerKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
T HauerKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
A WillmsKlinik für Allgemein- Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Deutschland.
H J BuhrDeutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland.
C-T GermerKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
R SchwabKlinik für Allgemein- Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Deutschland.
J F LockKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland. lock_j@ukw.de.
Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Militär- und Notfallchirurgie (CAMIN) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to a decreasing number of emergency procedures for body cavity injuries, surgical training is inadequate and current educational concepts must be reconsidered. The German Society for General and Visceral Surgery has set up a surgical training course in 2014 to overcome this shortage. In order to assess the eligibility, needs, benefits and success of such a training format, participants were asked to evaluate the program. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll participants evaluated the course during participation and were later asked to answer an online survey regarding their age, gender, level of surgical education, surgical discipline, level of care of the hospital, emergency surgical experience and frequency of performing emergency surgery, participation in other programs, experiences after participating in the course, rating of the current training curriculum and funding of such courses.

resultsOut of 142 participants 83 replied to the online survey. Over 90% reported a lasting positive influence of the course on emergency surgical skills. More than half of the responders remembered a clinical situation which they successfully managed due to the skills they gained during the course. Surgeons experienced in emergency treatment felt significantly more benefit than less experienced colleagues. A consultancy position, the level of care of the hospital, age and sex of the participants did not influence the overall benefits reported. The majority of responding surgeons were in favor of including such a training course in surgical education and stipulated public financial support.

conclusionCourse formats that mediate emergency surgery strategies and skills are established and well accepted. Training of surgeons in life-saving emergency surgery is in the public interest and is also partly the responsibility of society.

Indexed as

General SurgerySurgeonsClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansIncomeSurveys and QuestionnairesAbdominal traumaDamage control surgeryShooting injuriesStab woundsTerror attack trauma

Identifiers

PMID32313966
PMCPMC7716888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.