Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32313949›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Prism Adaptation Modulates Connectivity of the Intraparietal Sulcus with Multiple Brain Networks.

Selene Schintu, Michael Freedberg, Stephen J Gotts, Catherine A Cunningham, Zaynah M Alam, Sarah Shomstein, Eric M Wassermann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Selene SchintuBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Michael FreedbergBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Stephen J GottsLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Catherine A CunninghamBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Zaynah M AlamBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Sarah ShomsteinDepartment of Psychology George Washington University Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Eric M WassermannBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USGeorge Washington University · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Electrophysiological Probes And Treatments In Neurobehavioral DisordersZIANS002977 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI WASSERMANN, ERIC M · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prism adaptation (PA) alters spatial cognition according to the direction of visual displacement by temporarily modifying sensorimotor mapping. Right-shifting prisms (right PA) improve neglect of left visual field in patients, possibly by decreasing activity in the left hemisphere and increasing it in the right. Left PA shifts attention rightward in healthy individuals by an opposite mechanism. However, functional imaging studies of PA are inconsistent, perhaps because of differing activation tasks. We measured resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in healthy individuals before and after PA. When contrasted, right versus left PA decreased RSFC in the spatial navigation network defined by the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC), hippocampus, and cerebellum. Within-PA-direction comparisons showed that right PA increased RSFC in subregions of the PPCs and between the PPCs and the right middle frontal gyrus and left PA decreased RSFC between these regions. Both right and left PA decreased RSFC between the PPCs and bilateral temporal areas. In summary, right PA increases connectivity in the right frontoparietal network and left PA produces essentially opposite effects. Furthermore, right, compared with left, PA modulates RSFC in the right hemisphere navigation network.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAttentionBrainFemaleHumansMaleNeural PathwaysParietal LobeSpace Perceptionnavigation networkneglectparahippocampal gyrusparietal cortexvisuospatial attention

Identifiers

PMID32313949
PMCPMC7526755
OpenAlexW3017139547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.