Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32313939›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Setting the basis of best practices and standards for curation and annotation of logical models in biology-highlights of the [BC]2 2019 CoLoMoTo/SysMod Workshop.

Anna Niarakis, Martin Kuiper, Marek Ostaszewski, Rahuman S Malik Sheriff, Cristina Casals-Casas, Denis Thieffry, Tom C Freeman, Paul Thomas, Vasundra Touré, Vincent Noël and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Boolean modelling as a logic-based dynamic approach in systems medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anna Niarakis
Martin Kuiper
Marek Ostaszewski
Rahuman S Malik Sheriff
Cristina Casals-Casas
Denis Thieffry
Tom C Freeman
Paul Thomas
Vasundra Touré
Vincent Noël
Gautier Stoll
Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Aurélien Naldi
Eugenia Oshurko
Ioannis Xenarios
Sylvain Soliman
Claudine Chaouiya
Tomáš Helikar
Laurence Calzone

Funding

Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
Gene Ontology ConsortiumP41HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
GENE ONTOLOGY CONSORTIUMR01HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2001 to 2003
$5.8M
Software for collaborative construction, simulation, and analysis of mechanistic computational models of biological systemsR35GM119770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI Tomas Helikar · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019482/1NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fast accumulation of biological data calls for their integration, analysis and exploitation through more systematic approaches. The generation of novel, relevant hypotheses from this enormous quantity of data remains challenging. Logical models have long been used to answer a variety of questions regarding the dynamical behaviours of regulatory networks. As the number of published logical models increases, there is a pressing need for systematic model annotation, referencing and curation in community-supported and standardised formats. This article summarises the key topics and future directions of a meeting entitled 'Annotation and curation of computational models in biology', organised as part of the 2019 [BC]2 conference. The purpose of the meeting was to develop and drive forward a plan towards the standardised annotation of logical models, review and connect various ongoing projects of experts from different communities involved in the modelling and annotation of molecular biological entities, interactions, pathways and models. This article defines a roadmap towards the annotation and curation of logical models, including milestones for best practices and minimum standard requirements.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPractice Guidelines as TopicComputational BiologyReproducibility of Resultsannotation standardsbiocurationlogical modellingmodel reusabilityreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID32313939
PMCPMC7986594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.