ArticleLearning health systems2020
The European medical information framework: A novel ecosystem for sharing healthcare data across Europe.
Article in Learning health systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Real-World Evidence Through a Federated Health Data Network (EHDEN): Descriptive Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Exploring Metadata Catalogs in Health Care Data Ecosystems: Taxonomy Development Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- The Innovative Health Initiative public-private partnership: a catalyst for big data-driven health research and innovation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Accelerating Parkinson's Disease drug development with federated learning approaches.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Principles for Good Practice in the Conduct of Non-interventional Studies: The View of Industry Researchers.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Article
- Drug utilization analysis of osteoporosis medications in seven European electronic health databases.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023Article
- Article
- ADataViewer: exploring semantically harmonized Alzheimer's disease cohort datasets.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2022Article
- Register-based information on thyroid diseases in Europe: lessons and results from the EUthyroid collaboration.Endocrine connections · 2022Article
- Quality of Hospital Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data Based on the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) in Heart Failure: Pilot Data Quality Assessment Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Common Problems, Common Data Model Solutions: Evidence Generation for Health Technology Assessment.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Article
- The European medical information framework: A novel ecosystem for sharing healthcare data across Europe.Learning health systems · 2020Article
- TRC-PAD: Accelerating Recruitment of AD Clinical Trials through Innovative Information Technology.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2020Article
- The Multiple Sclerosis Data Alliance Catalogue: Enabling Web-Based Discovery of Metadata from Real-World Multiple Sclerosis Data Sources.International journal of MS careArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe European medical information framework (EMIF) was an Innovative Medicines Initiative project jointly supported by the European Union and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, that generated a common technology and governance framework to identify, assess and (re)use healthcare data, to facilitate real-world data research. The objectives of EMIF included providing a unified platform to support a wide range of studies within two verification programmes-Alzheimer's disease (EMIF-AD), and metabolic consequences of obesity (EMIF-MET).
methodsThe EMIF platform was built around two main data-types: electronic health record data and research cohort data, and the platform architecture composed of a set of tools designed to enable data discovery and characterisation. This included the EMIF catalogue, which allowed users to find relevant data sources, including the data-types collected. Data harmonisation via a common data model were central to the project especially for population data sources. EMIF also developed an ethical code of practice to ensure data protection, patient confidentiality and compliance with the European Data Protection Directive, and GDPR.
resultsCurrently 18 population-based disease agnostic and 60 cohort-based Alzheimer's data partners from across 14 countries are contained within the catalogue, and this will continue to expand. The work conducted in EMIF-AD and EMIF-MET includes standardizing cohorts, summarising baseline characteristics of patients, developing diagnostic algorithms, epidemiological studies, identifying and validating novel biomarkers and selecting potential patient samples for pharmacological intervention.
conclusionsEMIF was designed to provide a sustainable model as demonstrated by the sustainability plans for EMIF-AD. Although network-wide studies using EMIF were not conducted during this project to evaluate its sustainability, learning from EMIF will be used in the follow-on IMI-2 project, European Health Data and Evidence Network (EHDEN). Furthermore, EMIF has facilitated collaborations between partners and continues to promote a wider adoption of principles, technology and architecture through some of its continued work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.