ArticleLearning health systems2020
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: Recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Article in Learning health systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Standards-Based, Cloud-Hosted CDS System for Gonorrhea Treatment and HIV Screening.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Preferences of Chinese Women for Perinatal Depression Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- New Performance Measurement Framework for Realizing Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Achieving a rapid and continuous learning health system requires socio-technical harmonization of research and operational IT.npj health systems · 2025Review
- Review
- 21st century (clinical) decision support in nursing and allied healthcare. Developing a learning health system: a reasoned design of a theoretical framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Review
- A lifecycle framework illustrates eight stages necessary for realizing the benefits of patient-centered clinical decision support.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Lessons Learned from a National Initiative Promoting Publicly Available Standards-Based Clinical Decision Support.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- Promoting TEFCA with Blockchain Technology: A Decentralized Approach to Patient-centered Healthcare Data Management.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Article
- Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- The technical landscape for patient-centered CDS: progress, gaps, and challenges.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Computable Guidelines and Clinical Decision Support for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management to Improve Outcomes and Health Equity.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- Preferences of gastric cancer survivors for follow-up care-a multicenter discrete choice experiment study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Categorizing metadata to help mobilize computable biomedical knowledge.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- A scoping review of knowledge authoring tools used for developing computerized clinical decision support systems.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Desiderata for the development of next-generation electronic health record phenotype libraries.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Summary of third annual MCBK public meeting: Mobilizing computable biomedical knowledge-Accelerating the second knowledge revolution.Learning health systems · 2021Article
- Integrating the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model With Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support Design: Implementation Science Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. We discuss our investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG). The TFWG identified 12 actors (eg, vendors, clinicians, and policy makers) within a CDS ecosystem who each may play a meaningful role in prioritizing, authoring, implementing, or evaluating CDS and developed 33 recommendations distributed across nine "trust attributes." The trust attributes and recommendations represent a range of considerations such as the "Competency" of knowledge artifact engineers and the "Organizational Capacity" of institutions that develop and implement CDS. The TFWG findings highlight an initial effort to make trust explicit and embedded within CDS knowledge artifacts and repositories and thus more broadly accepted and used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.