ArticleCureus2020
The Value of a Synthetic Model-based Training Lab to Increase Proficiency with Endoscopic Approaches to the Spine.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Simulation training in spinal endoscopic surgery: a systematic review of current status.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Reducing the learning curve of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy: mushroom model-simulation training.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe learning curve associated with endoscopic approaches to the spine is well established. In this study, we present our endoscopic training methodology and discuss the concepts and rationale of laboratory training as it relates to improving comfort and skill with endoscopic techniques. MATERIALS AND
methodsA three-part endoscopic training laboratory for neurosurgical trainees and attendings was organized at the University of Miami, which included a lecture, instrumentation demonstration, and both synthetic model and cadaveric practice sessions. Participants completed pre- and post-lab surveys gauging their comfort and competency in the transforaminal approach to the lumbar spine.
resultsThere were a total of 22 participants, with eight completing the pre-lab survey and 10 completing the post-lab survey. Sixteen participants engaged in the lab practical, with six of these participants performing the transforaminal approach on both the model and the cadaver. An increase in comfort level was demonstrated on the post-lab survey (5.9/10) for the transforaminal approach as compared to the pre-lab survey (2.6/10). Additionally, participants found the training model to be an effective teaching aid for the transforaminal technique (8.8/10).
conclusionsWe believe that our study demonstrates the utility of simulated model-based training for gaining comfort and proficiency with endoscopic approaches to the spine and introduces a safe, cost-effective method of educating practitioners on novel endoscopic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.