ArticleEvolution letters2020
Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology.
Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Situ GWAS in Two Range-Edge Populations of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Identify Genetic Factors of Adaptation to Climate Change.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Satellite data show trees delay budburst across landscapes to escape herbivores.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Greater climate change adaptation potential in populations of Quercus macrocarpa at edges of latitudinal gradient.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Low but significant evolutionary potential for growth, phenology and reproduction traits in European beech.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Latitudinal clines in the phenology of floral display associated with adaptive evolution during a biological invasion.American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Paleorecords Reveal Biological Mechanisms Crucial for Reliable Species Range Shift Projections Amid Rapid Climate Change.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting the Responses of Functional Leaf Traits to Global Warming: AnPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reduced within-population quantitative genetic variation is associated with climate harshness in maritime pine.Heredity · 2023Article
- Antagonistic Effects of Assortative Mating on the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity along Environmental Gradients.The American naturalist · 2023Article
- Assortative mating for reproductive timing affects population recruitment and resilience in a quantitative genetic model.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Leaf habit affects the distribution of drought sensitivity but not water transport efficiency in the tropics.Ecology letters · 2022Article
- The influence of genetic architecture on responses to selection under drought in rice.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Article
- Assortative mating can help adaptation of flowering time to a changing climate: Insights from a polygenic model.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Article
- Frequency dependence and the predictability of evolution in a changing environment.Evolution letters · 2022Article
- Counter-gradient variation of reproductive effort in a widely distributed temperate oak (Functional ecology · 2021Article
- How did the characteristics of the growing season change during the past 100 years at a steep river basin in Japan?PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many theoretical models predict when genetic evolution and phenotypic plasticity allow adaptation to changing environmental conditions. These models generally assume stabilizing selection around some optimal phenotype. We however often ignore how optimal phenotypes change with the environment, which limit our understanding of the adaptive value of phenotypic plasticity. Here, we propose an approach based on our knowledge of the causal relationships between climate, adaptive traits, and fitness to further these questions. This approach relies on a sensitivity analysis of the process-based model phenofit, which mathematically formalizes these causal relationships, to predict fitness landscapes and optimal budburst dates along elevation gradients in three major European tree species. Variation in the overall shape of the fitness landscape and resulting directional selection gradients were found to be mainly driven by temperature variation. The optimal budburst date was delayed with elevation, while the range of dates allowing high fitness narrowed and the maximal fitness at the optimum decreased. We also found that the plasticity of the budburst date should allow tracking the spatial variation in the optimal date, but with variable mismatch depending on the species, ranging from negligible mismatch in fir, moderate in beech, to large in oak. Phenotypic plasticity would therefore be more adaptive in fir and beech than in oak. In all species, we predicted stronger directional selection for earlier budburst date at higher elevation. The weak selection on budburst date in fir should result in the evolution of negligible genetic divergence, while beech and oak would evolve counter-gradient variation, where genetic and environmental effects are in opposite directions. Our study suggests that theoretical models should consider how whole fitness landscapes change with the environment. The approach introduced here has the potential to be developed for other traits and species to explore how populations will adapt to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.