Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32313627›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Allometric escape from acoustic constraints is rare for frog calls.

João Filipe Riva Tonini, Diogo B Provete, Natan M Maciel, Alessandro Ribeiro Morais, Sandra Goutte, Luís Felipe Toledo, Robert Alexander Pyron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Individual variation in animal communication: from species averages to unique voices.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Signal size allometry inBiology letters · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Allometric escape and acoustic signal features facilitate high-frequency communication in an endemic Chinese primate.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

João Filipe Riva ToniniDepartment of Biological Sciences The George Washington University Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4730-3805
Diogo B ProveteSetor de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Mato Grosso do Sul Campo Grande Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0097-0651
Natan M MacielDepartamento de Ecologia Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás Goiânia Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5654-0645
Alessandro Ribeiro MoraisLaboratório de Biologia Animal, Instituto Federal Goiano Rio Verde Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-5790
Sandra GoutteLaboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros Departamento de Biologia Animal Instituto de Biologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-3773
Luís Felipe ToledoLaboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros Departamento de Biologia Animal Instituto de Biologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-9598
Robert Alexander PyronDepartment of Biological Sciences The George Washington University Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2524-1794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allometric constraint is a product of natural selection and physical laws, particularly with respect to body size and traits constrained by properties thereof, such as metabolism, longevity, and vocal frequency. Allometric relationships are often conserved across lineages, indicating that physical constraints dictate scaling patterns in deep time, despite substantial genetic and ecological divergence among organisms. In particular, acoustic allometry (sound frequency ~ body size) is conserved across frogs, in defiance of massive variation in both body size and frequency. Here, we ask how many instances of allometric escape have occurred across the frog tree of life using a Bayesian framework that estimates the location, number, and magnitude of shifts in the adaptive landscape of acoustic allometry. Moreover, we test whether ecology in terms of calling site could affect these relationships. We find that calling site has a major influence on acoustic allometry. Despite this, we identify only four major instances of allometric escape, potentially deriving from ecomorphological adaptations to new signal modalities. In these instances of allometric escape, the optima and strength of the scaling relationship are different than expected for most other frog species, representing new adaptive regimes of body size ~ call frequency. Allometric constraints on frog calls are highly conserved and have rarely allowed escape, despite frequent invasions of new adaptive regimes and dramatic ecomorphological divergence. Our results highlight the rare instances in which natural and sexual selection combined can overcome physical constraints on sound production.

Indexed as

adaptive evolutionadvertisement callanuransevolutionphylogenetic comparative methods

Identifiers

PMID32313627
PMCPMC7160179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.