ReviewShoulder & elbow2020
Outcomes of scapulothoracic fusion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A systematic review.
Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Comparison of the Effects of Scapulothoracic Arthrodesis Surgery Versus Usual Care on Balance and Gait Parameters in Patients With Fascioscapulohumeral Dystrophy: One-Blind Study
Does the Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Program Implemented on Individuals With Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy, Followed by Various Interventions, Have an Impact on Function, Balance, and Gait?
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A study evaluating differences in 3D upper limb kinematics and surface electromyography measures in adults with and without facioscapulohumeral dystrophy.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Dorsal Claviculectomy For Treatment Of Brachial Plexus Injury After Scapulothoracic Fusion: A Case Report And Literature Review.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Scapulothoracic tenodesis using hamstring tendon graft for treatment of problematic scapula winging: A new surgical technique.Shoulder & elbow · 2024Article
- Scapulothoracic fusion using nonabsorbable suture fixation: surgical technique and review of the literature.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a rare condition associated with selective weakness of the muscles of the upper arm, face, and shoulder girdle, negatively affecting daily activities. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis may restore shoulder function and improve quality of life. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the outcomes and complications of scapulothoracic arthrodesis in FSHD patients.
methodsMedline, Pubmed, and Embase were systematically searched. Studies were included if they described scapulothoracic arthrodesis in FSHD with follow-up, and outcomes were adequately reported. Thirteen eligible articles reported the outcomes of 199 arthrodesis in 130 patients.
resultsThe mean gain of shoulder forward elevation and abduction were 45° (p < 0.05) and 40° (p < 0.05), respectively. There was an overall cosmetic satisfaction and improved performance of daily activities. There is limited and heterogeneous data on changes in pulmonary function, but such changes are clinically insignificant. The rate of complications was 41% of which 10% were serious, requiring an intervention or re-admission. The most common complications were hardware failure (8%), non-union (6%), and pneumothorax (5%). DISCUSSION: Scapulothoracic arthrodesis improved cosmesis, performance of daily activities and shoulder motion with no clinically significant loss of pulmonary function. The complication rate is high, and some are potentially serious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.