ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2019
Reducing pain at split thickness donor sites with silicone dressing compared to petrolatum gauze dressing.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanofiber Matrix Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Study.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
- Recent Updates on the Management of Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Comparison of Ba-Hao burn ointment gauze and petrolatum gauze in split graft donor site healing: A randomized, prospective, and self-control study.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many modalities have been introduced to reduce devastating pain at the donor area. This is a prospective, randomized study to assess the effect of silicone dressing in reducing pain at split-thickness skin donor sites, and compare it with traditional petrolatum gauze. The patients were allocated to receive standard dressing (petrolatum gauze) or silicone dressing over skin donor sites. Pattern and severity of pain at the sites were assessed in both groups using the Visual Analog Scale for pain. Pattern of pain at the donor site during the postoperative period was consistently lower with silicone dressing (p<0.005). Regarding severity of pain, there were differences between the two groups (p.<005), but there were no significant differences between the two sexes regarding pattern and severity of pain (p>0.5). This study showed silicone dressing to be superior to petrolatum gauze in reducing severity and pattern of pain. It may increase patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32313535PMC7155406W3026085663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.