Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32313046›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A fungal pathogen induces systemic susceptibility and systemic shifts in wheat metabolome and microbiome composition.

Heike Seybold, Tobias J Demetrowitsch, M Amine Hassani, Silke Szymczak, Ekaterina Reim, Janine Haueisen, Luisa Lübbers, Malte Rühlemann, Andre Franke, Karin Schwarz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the antifungal activity of the wheat microbiome.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Heike SeyboldBotanical Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-7004
Tobias J Demetrowitsch *Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Kiel University, Heinrich-Hecht-Platz 10, 24118, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3528-0255
M Amine Hassani *Botanical Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-4940
Silke SzymczakInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-9035
Ekaterina ReimBotanical Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Janine HaueisenBotanical Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-0705
Luisa LübbersBotanical Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Malte RühlemannInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 11, 24118, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-0052
Andre FrankeInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 11, 24118, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-5811
Karin SchwarzInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Kiel University, Heinrich-Hecht-Platz 10, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Eva H StukenbrockBotanical Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany. estukenbrock@bot.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-3345
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yield losses caused by fungal pathogens represent a major threat to global food production. One of the most devastating fungal wheat pathogens is Zymoseptoria tritici. Despite the importance of this fungus, the underlying mechanisms of plant-pathogen interactions are poorly understood. Here we present a conceptual framework based on coinfection assays, comparative metabolomics, and microbiome profiling to study the interaction of Z. tritici in susceptible and resistant wheat. We demonstrate that Z. tritici suppresses the production of immune-related metabolites in a susceptible cultivar. Remarkably, this fungus-induced immune suppression spreads within the leaf and even to other leaves, a phenomenon that we term "systemic induced susceptibility". Using a comparative metabolomics approach, we identify defense-related biosynthetic pathways that are suppressed and induced in susceptible and resistant cultivars, respectively. We show that these fungus-induced changes correlate with changes in the wheat leaf microbiome. Our findings suggest that immune suppression by this hemibiotrophic pathogen impacts specialized plant metabolism, alters its associated microbial communities, and renders wheat vulnerable to further infections.

Indexed as

MetabolomeAscomycotaBenzoxazinesBiosynthetic PathwaysCoinfectionHost-Pathogen InteractionsMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant LeavesSecondary MetabolismTriticumBenzoxazines

Identifiers

PMID32313046
PMCPMC7171108
OpenAlexW3016323864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.