ArticleScientific reports2020
Improved fidelity of orientation perception: a learning effect dissociable from enhanced discriminability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual perception can be influenced by stimulus context, selective attention, and prior experience. Many previous studies have shown complex interactions among these influencing factors, but it remains unclear whether context-induced illusions could be reduced by perceptual training and whether such a change in perceptual fidelity is linked to improved perceptual discriminability. To address this question, we introduced a context-induced tilt illusion into an orientation discrimination training paradigm. This resulted in parallel and long-term improvements in the discriminability and fidelity of orientation perception. The improved discriminability was specific to the task-relevant target stimulus but nonspecific to the task-irrelevant context. By contrast, the improved perceptual fidelity was specific to the task-irrelevant contextual stimulus that induced the illusion, but not specific to the task-relevant target stimulus or task performed on one of its features. These results indicate two dissociable learning effects associated with the same training procedure. Such a dissociation was further supported by the observation that the sizes of the two learning effects were uncorrelated across the subjects. Our findings suggest two parallel learning processes: a task-dependent process giving rise to enhanced discriminability for the task-relevant stimulus attribute, and a context-dependent process leading to improved perceptual fidelity for the attended stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.