Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312845›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2020

Acquiring and Analyzing Data Independent Acquisition Proteomics Experiments without Spectrum Libraries.

Lindsay K Pino, Seth C Just, Michael J MacCoss, Brian C Searle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proteomic Profiling of Complement Components in Glomerular Disease.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lindsay K PinoDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Seth C JustProteome Software, Inc. Portland, Oregon, USA.
Michael J MacCossDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brian C SearleInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address: bsearle@systemsbiology.org.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Molecular Phenotyping in Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG053959 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, ERIC B, MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2017
$4.1M
Skyline Targeted Proteomics EnvironmentR01GM103551 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2020
$3.4M
A universal multiplexing approach to unlock the hidden proteomeR01GM133981 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SWANEY, DANIELLE L · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
Molecular phenotyping of the yeast replicative life span response to genetic and environmental modulatorsF31AG055257 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PINO, LINDSAY K · 2016 to 2018
$119k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG055257NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG053959NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103551NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM133981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data independent acquisition (DIA) is an attractive alternative to standard shotgun proteomics methods for quantitative experiments. However, most DIA methods require collecting exhaustive, sample-specific spectrum libraries with data dependent acquisition (DDA) to detect and quantify peptides. In addition to working with non-human samples, studies of splice junctions, sequence variants, or simply working with small sample yields can make developing DDA-based spectrum libraries impractical. Here we illustrate how to acquire, queue, and validate DIA data without spectrum libraries, and provide a workflow to efficiently generate DIA-only chromatogram libraries using gas-phase fractionation (GPF). We present best-practice methods for collecting DIA data using Orbitrap-based instruments and develop an understanding for why DIA using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer should be approached differently than when using time-of-flight instruments. Finally, we discuss several methods for analyzing DIA data without libraries.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryChromatography, GasChromatography, LiquidDatabases, ProteinHeLa CellsHumansMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteomeProteomicsSoftwarePeptide LibraryPeptidesProteomeData evaluationdata independent acquisitionDIAlabel-free quantificationmass spectrometryprotein identificationquantification

Identifiers

PMID32312845
PMCPMC7338082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.