Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312777›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020

Safety and Tolerability of More than Six Days of Tedizolid Treatment.

Mireia Mensa Vendrell, Maria Tasias Pitarch, Miguel Salavert Lletí, Eva Calabuig Muñoz, Laura Morata Ruiz, Genís Castells Lao, Ester López Suñé, Jose Mensa Pueyo, Maria Rosa Oltra Sempere, Maria-Luisa Pedro-Botet Montoya and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  11. The Role of Novel Antibiotics in the Management of Diabetic Foot Infection.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Management ofEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Novel oxazolidinones harbor potentFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Tedizolid: new data and experiences for clinical practice.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Mireia Mensa VendrellPharmacy Department, Hospital Plató, Barcelona, Spain mireia.mensa@hospitalplato.com ASORIANO@clinic.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-3058-7271
Maria Tasias PitarchDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Miguel Salavert LletíDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Eva Calabuig MuñozDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Laura Morata RuizDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Genís Castells LaoPharmacy Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2588-4490
Ester López SuñéPharmacy Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Mensa PueyoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Rosa Oltra SempereDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de València, Valencia, Spain.
Maria-Luisa Pedro-Botet MontoyaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Valentina IserniaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Esteban Alberto Reynaga SosaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Leonor Moreno NuñezDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Pasquau LiañoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Sergio Sequera ArquelladasDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves de Granada, Granada, Spain.
José Ramón Yuste AraDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8502-9539
Alex Soriano ViladomiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain mireia.mensa@hospitalplato.com ASORIANO@clinic.cat.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Plató · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tedizolid has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in clinical trials; however, data concerning its tolerability in long-term treatments are scarce. The aim of the study was to assess the indications and to describe the long-term safety profile of tedizolid. A multicentric retrospective study of patients who received tedizolid for more than 6 days was conducted. Adverse events (AEs) were identified from patients' medical records and laboratory data. The World Health Organization causality categories were used to discern AEs that were probably associated with tedizolid. Eighty-one patients, treated with tedizolid 200 mg once daily for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of 28 (14 to 59) days, were included; 36 (44.4%) had previously received linezolid. The most common reasons for selecting tedizolid were to avoid linezolid potential toxicities or interactions (53.1%) or due to previous linezolid-related toxicities (27.2%). The most common indications were off-label, including prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, and respiratory infections (77.8%). Overall, 9/81 patients (11.1%) experienced a probably associated AE. Two patients (2.5%) developed gastrointestinal disorders, 1 (1.2%) developed anemia, and 6 developed thrombocytopenia (7.4%) after a median (IQR) duration of treatment of 26.5 (17 to 58.5) days. Four (5%) patients discontinued tedizolid due to AEs. Among 23 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), the rate of myelotoxicity was 17.4%, and only 8.7% had to stop tedizolid; 20 out of 22 with previous linezolid-associated toxicity had no AE. Long-term tedizolid treatments had good tolerance with rates of gastrointestinal AE and hematological toxicity lower than those reported with linezolid, particularly in patients with CRF and in those with a history of linezolid-associated toxicity.

Indexed as

Skin Diseases, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansOrganophosphatesOxazolesOxazolidinonesRetrospective StudiesTetrazolesAnti-Bacterial AgentsOrganophosphatesOxazolesOxazolidinonestedizolidTetrazolesadverse eventssafetytedizolidtolerability

Identifiers

PMID32312777
PMCPMC7318044
OpenAlexW3016665071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.