Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312727›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Multiple Interventions for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment Trial (MIDFUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sarah Brown, Jane Nixon, Myka Ransom, Rachael Gilberts, Nikki Dewhirst, Elizabeth McGinnis, Roberta Longo, Frances Game, Chris Bojke, Paul Chadwick and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of 15% lysine cream in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized interventional study.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah BrownClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK medsbro@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1840-3786
Jane NixonClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Myka RansomClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Rachael GilbertsClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nikki DewhirstClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Elizabeth McGinnisClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Roberta LongoAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Frances GameDerby Teaching Hospitals NHS Fundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Chris BojkeAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Paul ChadwickCollege of Podiatry, London, UK.
Akila ChandrasekarNHS Blood and Transplant, Liverpool, UK.
Ian ChetterUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Howard CollierClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Catherine FernandezClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Shervanthi Homer-VanniasinkamLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Edward JudeTameside General Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Richard LeighRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard LomasNHS Blood and Transplant, Liverpool, UK.
Peter VowdenBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
James WasonMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Linda SharplesDepartment of Medical Statistics, London Schoool of Hygience and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David RussellClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCollege of Podiatry · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBTameside Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 15/08/77Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/6Medical Research Council MR/N028171/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes affects more than 425 million people worldwide with a lifetime risk of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) of up to 25%. Management includes wound debridement, wound dressings, offloading, treatment of infection and ischaemia, optimising glycaemic control; use of advanced adjuvant therapies is limited by high cost and lack of robust evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, seamless phase II/III, open, parallel group, multi-arm multi-stage randomised controlled trial in patients with a hard-to-heal DFU, with blinded outcome assessment. A maximum of 447 participants will be randomised (245 participants in phase II and 202 participants in phase III). The phase II primary objective will determine the efficacy of treatment strategies including hydrosurgical debridement ± decellularised dermal allograft, or the combination with negative pressure wound therapy, as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU), compared with TAU alone, with patients randomised in a 1:1:1:2 allocation. The outcome is achieving at least 50% reduction in index ulcer area at 4 weeks post randomisation.The phase III primary objective will determine whether one treatment strategy, continued from phase II, reduces time to healing of the index ulcer compared with TAU alone, with participants randomised in a 1:1 allocation. Secondary objectives will compare healing status of the index ulcer, infection rate, reulceration, quality of life, cost-effectiveness and incidence of adverse events over 52 weeks post randomisation. Phase II and phase III primary endpoint analysis will be conducted using a mixed-effects logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. A within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken; the primary economic analysis will be a cost-utility analysis presenting ICERs for each treatment strategy in rank order of effectiveness, with effects expressed as quality-adjusted life years.The trial has predefined progression criteria for the selection of one treatment strategy into phase III based on efficacy, safety and costs at 4 weeks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee Yorkshire and The Humber - Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee; approved 26 April 2017; (REC reference: 17/YH/0055). There is planned publication of a monograph in National Institute for Health Research journals and main trial results and associated papers in high-impact peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN64926597; registered on 6 June 2017.

Indexed as

DebridementDiabetic FootNegative-Pressure Wound TherapySkin TransplantationAcellular DermisAdultClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes MellitusHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWound Healingclinical trialsdiabetes & endocrinologydiabetic footstatistics & research methodswound management

Identifiers

PMID32312727
PMCPMC7245399
OpenAlexW3017098054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.