Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312578›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2020

Midbrain D

Stephanie M Groman, Ansel T Hillmer, Heather Liu, Krista Fowles, Daniel Holden, Evan D Morris, Daeyeol Lee, Jane R Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The selective DNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal striatum functional connectivity predicts incubation of opioid craving after voluntary abstinence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie M GromanDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: stephanie.groman@yale.edu.
Ansel T HillmerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale Positron Emission Tomography Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Heather LiuRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Krista FowlesYale Positron Emission Tomography Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Daniel HoldenYale Positron Emission Tomography Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Evan D MorrisRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale Positron Emission Tomography Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; inviCRO, LLC, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daeyeol LeeZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jane R TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: jane.taylor@yale.edu.
Yale University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Individual differences & cocaine effects on impulsive choice in rats: D3/5HT1B R01DA043443 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Jane R Taylor · 2016 to 2026
$4.6M
Decision-Making Dysfunction and Chronic CocaineR01DA041480 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JANE R · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Multimodal Neuroimaging of Alcohol Withdrawal: The Role of Glutamate in Neural ReorganizationK01AA024788 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HILLMER, ANSEL · 2017 to 2021
$894k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024788NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041480NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults from neuroimaging studies suggest that disruptions in flexible decision-making functions in substance-dependent individuals are a consequence of drug-induced neural adaptations. In addicted populations, however, the causal relationship between biobehavioral phenotypes of susceptibility and addiction consequence is difficult to dissociate. Indeed, evidence from animals suggests that poor decision making due to preexisting biological factors can independently enhance the risk for developing addiction-like behaviors. Neuroimaging studies in animals provide a unique translational approach for the identification of the neurobiological mechanisms that mediate susceptibility to addiction.

methodsWe used positron emission tomography in rats to quantify regional dopamine D

resultsWe found that deficits specifically in reward-guided choice behavior on the probabilistic reversal learning task predicted greater escalation of cocaine self-administration behavior and greater motivation for cocaine and, critically, were associated with higher midbrain D

conclusionsThese findings indicate that our identified D

Indexed as

CocaineCocaine-Related DisordersAnimalsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsExtinction, PsychologicalMesencephalonRatsReceptors, Dopamine D3Self AdministrationCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsReceptors, Dopamine D3

Identifiers

PMID32312578
PMCPMC8954711
OpenAlexW3006837144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.