ArticleTrials2020
Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease (TAPS-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03975894 (A Feasibility Trial of Serial Prophylactic Exchange Blood Transfusion in Pregnant Women With Sickle Cell Disease Aiming to Improve Maternal and Infant Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Feasibility Trial of Serial Prophylactic Exchange Blood Transfusion in Pregnant Women With Sickle Cell Disease Aiming to Improve Maternal and Infant Outcomes
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The acceptability and feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion versus usual care in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Trial
- Prophylactic exchange transfusion in sickle cell disease pregnancy: a TAPS2 feasibility randomized controlled trial.Blood advances · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Impact of scheduled partial exchange transfusions on outcomes in pregnant patients with severe sickle cell disease: a retrospective study.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2024Article
- Managing sickle cell disease and related complications in pregnancy: results of an international Delphi panel.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Red Blood Cell Exchange as a Valid Therapeutic Approach for Pregnancy Management in Sickle Cell Disease: Three Explicative Cases and Systematic Review of Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Sickle Cell Disease in the National Inpatient Sample, 2012-2018.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Evidence-based management of pregnant women with sickle cell disease in high-income countries.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022Article
- Indications for transfusion in the management of sickle cell disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021Review
- Pregnancies and Neonatal Outcomes in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD): Still a (High-)Risk Constellation?Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are associated with a higher risk of sickle and pregnancy complications. Limited options exist for treating SCD during pregnancy. Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) has been shown to be effective in treating SCD outside pregnancy, but evidence is lacking regarding its use during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of SPEBT in pregnant women with SCD.
methodsThe study is an individually randomised, two-arm, feasibility trial with embedded qualitative and health economic studies. Fifty women, 18 years of age and older, with SCD and a singleton pregnancy at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation will be recruited from six hospitals in England. Randomisation will be conducted using a secure online database and minimised by centre, SCD genotype and maternal age. Women allocated to the intervention arm will receive SPEBT commencing at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation, performed using automated erythrocytapheresis every 6-10 weeks until the end of pregnancy, aiming to maintain HbS% or combined HbS/HbC% below 30%. Women in the standard care arm will only receive transfusion when clinically indicated. The primary outcome will be the recruitment rate. Additional endpoints include reasons for refusal to participate, attrition rate, protocol adherence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women will be monitored throughout pregnancy to assess maternal, sickle, and foetal complications. Detailed information about adverse events (including hospital admission) and birth outcomes will be extracted from medical records and via interview at 6 weeks postpartum. An embedded qualitative study will consist of interviews with (a) 15-25 trial participants to assess experiences and acceptability, (b) 5-15 women who decline to participate to identify barriers to recruitment and (c) 15-20 clinical staff to explore fidelity and acceptability. A health economic study will inform a future cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. DISCUSSION: This feasibility study aims to rigorously evaluate SPEBT as a treatment for SCD in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes.
trial registrationNIH registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03975894 (registered 05/06/19); ISRCTN (www.isrctn.com), registration number ISRCTN52684446 (retrospectively registered 02/08/19).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.