Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312311›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

The influence of spaceflight on the astronaut salivary microbiome and the search for a microbiome biomarker for viral reactivation.

Camilla Urbaniak, Hernan Lorenzi, James Thissen, Crystal Jaing, Brian Crucian, Clarence Sams, Duane Pierson, Kasthuri Venkateswaran, Satish Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Saliva assay: a call for methodological standardization.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla UrbaniakNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Hernan LorenziDepartment of Infectious Diseases, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
James ThissenLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Crystal JaingLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Brian CrucianNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Clarence SamsNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Duane PiersonNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kasthuri VenkateswaranNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. kjvenkat@jpl.nasa.gov.
Satish MehtaJES Tech, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Johnson Space Center · USJet Propulsion Laboratory · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpaceflight impacts astronauts in many ways but little is known on how spaceflight affects the salivary microbiome and the consequences of these changes on astronaut health, such as viral reactivation. In order to understand this, the salivary microbiome was analyzed with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and saliva viral titers were analyzed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with primers specific for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV) from 10 astronauts pre-flight, in-flight, and post-flight.

resultsStreptococcus was the most abundant organism in the saliva, making up 8% of the total organisms detected, and their diversity decreased during spaceflight. Other organisms that had statistically significant changes were Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria which increased during flight and Actinobacteria which decreased during flight. At the genus level, Catonella, Megasphera, and Actinobacillus were absent in more than half of saliva samples collected pre-flight but were then detected during flight. In those subjects that already had these genera pre-flight, their relative abundances increased during flight. Correlation analyses between the microbiome and viral titers revealed a positive correlation with Gracilibacteria, Absconditabacteria, and Abiotrophia and a negative correlation between Oribacterium, Veillonella, and Haemophilus. There was also a significant positive correlation between microbiome richness and EBV viral titers.

conclusionsThis is the first study to look at how the salivary microbiome changes as a result of spaceflight and the search for bacterial biomarkers for viral reactivation. Further studies examining the role of specific organisms that were shown to be correlative and predictive in viral reactivation, a serious problem in astronauts during spaceflight, could lead to mitigation strategies to help prevent disease during both short and long duration space missions. Video abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSalivaSpace FlightVirus ActivationAdultAstronautsBacteriaBiomarkersHumansMaleStress, PhysiologicalViral LoadVirusesBiomarkersAstronaut microbiomeInternational space stationSalivary microbiomeSpaceflightViral reactivation

Identifiers

PMID32312311
PMCPMC7171750
OpenAlexW3016316470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.