Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312303›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2020

Anal extraskeletal osteosarcoma in a man: a case report and review of the literature.

Ramin Saadaat, Jamshid Abdul-Ghafar, Nasir Ud Din, Ahmed Maseh Haidary

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Superficial extraskeletal osteosarcoma. Case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Subcutaneous extraskeletal osteosarcoma of foot: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramin SaadaatDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, French Medical Institute for Mothers and Children (FMIC), Kabul, Afghanistan.
Jamshid Abdul-GhafarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, French Medical Institute for Mothers and Children (FMIC), Kabul, Afghanistan. jamshid.jalal@fmic.org.af.
Nasir Ud DinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital (AKU-H), Karachi, Pakistan.
Ahmed Maseh HaidaryDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, French Medical Institute for Mothers and Children (FMIC), Kabul, Afghanistan.
Kabul Medical University · AFAga Khan University Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteosarcoma is a common malignancy of bone that usually occurs in individuals in the age range of 0-24 years. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is a rare tumor presentation which originates in non-bony tissues. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma comprises 2-5% of all osteosarcomas and less than 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas. As compared to bone-derived osteosarcoma, extraskeletal osteosarcoma occurs in older age groups. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma has a poorer prognosis than bone osteosarcoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of extraskeletal osteosarcoma in the anal region. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old Hazara man presented to a private hospital with the chief complaints of constipation, bloody defecation, and pain during defecation of 1.5 months' duration. His past history was unremarkable. A digital rectal examination showed a solid growth in the middle part of his anus. A colonoscopic examination was done and showed a solid mass in his anal region. A computed tomography scan revealed an irregular mural thickening in the anal canal with heterogeneous enhancement. The maximum length of the involved segment was measured to be 4.5 cm. No suspicious lesions were noted in other organs. An abdominoperineal resection was performed on our patient. A 22 cm in length resected segment of his colon, consisting of the lower sigmoid, rectum, and anus was sent to us for histopathological examination. Gross examination revealed a polypoid dark-gray tumor measuring 5 × 3 × 2 cm. The cut section revealed gray and white appearance with firm-to-hard consistency and foci of ossification. Microscopic examination revealed normal anorectal mucosa and a spindle cell malignant neoplasm with osteoid formations. No evidence of epithelial carcinoma was noted. Immunohistochemical stains were positive for stabilin-2 and negative for cytokeratin, which confirmed the diagnosis of osteosarcoma.

conclusionExtraskeletal osteosarcoma of the colon is rare and presence of the tumor in the rectum and anal region is extremely rare. Radiology, colonoscopy, and histopathology with immunostaining are required for the diagnosis. The accurate diagnosis of extraskeletal osteosarcoma is important as it has a different regimen of treatment with poorer prognosis compared to primary osteosarcoma of the bone.

Indexed as

AgedAnal CanalAnus NeoplasmsHumansMaleOsteosarcomaRare DiseasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnusExtraskeletalOlder ageOsteosarcomaPoorer prognosis

Identifiers

PMID32312303
PMCPMC7171741
OpenAlexW3016373451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.