Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312300›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Phlebotomine sand flies in Southwest Germany: an update with records in new locations.

Sandra Oerther, Hanna Jöst, Anna Heitmann, Renke Lühken, Andreas Krüger, Irmgard Steinhausen, Christine Brinker, Susanne Lorentz, Michael Marx, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First Evidence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is leishmaniasis the new emerging zoonosis in the world?Veterinary research communications · 2023
    Review
  14. Prevalence and Factors Related toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sandra OertherInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hanna JöstBernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna HeitmannBernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Renke LühkenBernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas KrügerBundeswehr Hospital Hamburg-Branch Tropical Microbiology & Entomology, Hamburg, Germany.
Irmgard SteinhausenParasitus Ex e.V., Niederkassel, Germany.
Christine BrinkerBernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Susanne LorentzParasitus Ex e.V., Niederkassel, Germany.
Michael MarxInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonas Schmidt-ChanasitBernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Torsten NauckeParasitus Ex e.V., Niederkassel, Germany. tjnaucke@aol.com.
Norbert BeckerGerman Mosquito Control Association (KABS), Speyer, Germany.

Funding

Klaus Tschira Stiftung 00.309.2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVector-borne diseases (VBD) are of growing global importance. Sand flies are potential vectors for phleboviruses (family Phenuiviridae) including Toscana virus (TOSV), Sicilian virus, Sandfly fever, Naples virus, and Leishmania parasites in Europe. To date, only two phlebotomine species have been recorded for Germany: Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus mascittii. This study updates the distribution and abundance of the two occurring species.

methodsAn entomological field study was carried out during 2015-2018 to assess the abundance of sand flies in Southwest Germany within the federal states Baden-Wuerttemberg (BW) and Rhineland-Palatinate (RLP). A total of 176 collection sites were examined using CDC light traps.

resultsA total of 149 individuals of P. mascittii were collected. During 2015-2018, P. mascittii was found at all sites known positive from previous studies and was detected at 15 additional sites previously unknown for the presence of sand flies. Although the environment has changed considerably in 30 years, no significant difference in sand fly dynamics and distribution was found. Phlebotomus perniciosus has only been trapped once since 2001.

conclusionsThis study showed that sand flies occur in different areas in Southern Germany where they had not been recorded previously. Therefore, it can be assumed that they are more widespread than expected. In addition, sand flies could be found over several years at the same trapping sites, indicating population stability. This supports the need for continued surveillance of possible vector populations and urgent clarification of the vector competence of P. mascittii.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionAnimalsFemaleGeographyGermanyInsect VectorsLongitudinal StudiesMalePhlebotomusField studyGermanyPhlebotomus mascittiiSand fliesSpatial distribution

Identifiers

PMID32312300
PMCPMC7171781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.