Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32312225›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2020

Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial.

Kurt Ruetzler, Jacek Smereka, Cristian Abelairas-Gomez, Michael Frass, Marek Dabrowski, Szymon Bialka, Hanna Misiolek, Tadeusz Plusa, Oliver Robak, Olga Aniolek and 4 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03733158 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the New Flexible Tip Bougie Catheter and Standard Bougie Stylet for Tracheal Intubation by Anesthesiologists in Different Difficult Airway Scenarios: a Randomized Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLazarski UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled32ConditionsEmergency Medicine, Endotracheal Intubation, Cardiopulmonary ArrestArmsthe standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation, The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter
NCT05429112 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Comparison Between the Flexible Tip Bougie Vs Tube with Stylet for First-attempt Intubation Success with a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinico Universitario de SantiagoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled140ConditionsIntubation, Difficult or FailedArmsFlexible Tip Bougie, Endotracheal Tube with Stylet
NCT05429125 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Comparison Between the Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for First-attempt Intubation Success With the C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinico Universitario de SantiagoRan2022 to 2025Enrolled140ConditionsIntubation, Difficult or FailedArmsEndotracheal Tube with Stylet, Flexible Tip Bougie
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simulation in airway management teaching and training.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Kurt RuetzlerDepartments of Outcomes Research and General Anesthesia, Cleveland Clinic, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jacek SmerekaDepartment of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Cristian Abelairas-GomezCLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Michael FrassDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marek DabrowskiChair and Department of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Szymon BialkaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine with Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Hanna MisiolekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine with Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Tadeusz PlusaMedical Faculty, Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland.
Oliver RobakDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Olga AniolekPolish Society of Disaster Medicine, Swieradowska 43 Str, 02-662, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy Robert LadnyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Damian GorczycaPolish Society of Disaster Medicine, Swieradowska 43 Str, 02-662, Warsaw, Poland.
Sanchit AhujaDepartment of Anesthesia, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Lukasz SzarpakPolish Society of Disaster Medicine, Swieradowska 43 Str, 02-662, Warsaw, Poland. lukasz.szarpak@gmail.com.
Medical University of Silesia · PLMedical University of Vienna · ATCleveland Clinic · USHenry Ford Health System · USMedical University of Białystok · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUczelnia Łazarskiego · PLUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence of difficult endotracheal intubation ranges between 3 and 10%. Bougies have been recommended as an airway adjunct for difficult intubation, but reported success rates are variable. A new generation flexible tip bougie appears promising but was not investigated so far. We therefore compared the new flexible tip with a standard bougie in simulated normal and difficult airway scenarios, and used by experienced anesthesiologists.

methodsWe conducted a observational, randomized, cross-over simulation study. Following standardized training, experienced anesthesiologists performed endotracheal intubation using a Macintosh blade and one of the bougies in six different airway scenarios in a randomized sequence: normal airway, tongue edema, pharyngeal obstruction, manual cervical inline stabilization, cervical collar stabilization, cervical collar stabilization and pharyngeal obstruction. Overall success rate with a maximum of 3 intubation attempts was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included number of intubation attempts, time to intubation and dental compression.

resultsThirty-two anesthesiologist participated in this study between January 2019 and May 2019. Overall success rate was similar for the flexible tip bougie and the standard bougie. The flexible tip bougie tended to need less intubation attempts in more difficult airway scenarios. Time to intubation was less if using the flexible tip bougie compared to the standard bougie. Reduced severity of dental compression was noted for the flexible tip bougie in difficult airway scenarios except cervical collar stabilization.

conclusionIn this simulation study of normal and difficult airways scenarios, overall success rate was similar for the flexible tip and standard bougie. Especially in more difficult airway scenarios, less intubation attempts, and less optimization maneuvers were needed if using the flexible tip bougie.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03733158. 7th November 2018.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsCathetersClinical CompetenceCross-Over StudiesEquipment DesignHumansIntubation, IntratrachealManikinsSimulation TrainingTime FactorsAirway managementBougie catheterEndotracheal intubationMedical simulation

Identifiers

PMID32312225
PMCPMC7171857
OpenAlexW3016667735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.