Observational studyMedicine2020
Impact of Epstein-Barr virus coinfection in Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and Epstein-Barr virus co-infection.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Risk factors and clinical characteristics of fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a retrospective case‒control study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Navigating the outbreak: a comprehensive analysis of pediatricMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Analysis of the characteristics of mixed infections with Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the role of interleukin-2 and interleukin-12 in pediatric patients with concurrentWorld journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- High specificity of metagenomic next-generation sequencing using protected bronchial brushing sample in diagnosing pneumonia in children.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Effects of adjuvant pidotimod therapy on levels of inflammatory factors and expressions of serum GM-CSF and KL-6 in elderly patients with mycoplasma pneumonia.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) is one of the most common pathogens of respiratory infection in children, while Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is usually subclinical in immunocompetent children. Although single MP infection is common enough, MP and EBV coinfection have received little attention. Especially, the pathogenic role of EBV in lung when coinfection with MP, has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of EBV on MP pneumonia (MPP) in hospitalized children. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of MPP children who underwent screening for EBV by polymerase chain reaction in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid during hospitalization in 2014. Of total 147 patients, 68 patients were in the MP group and 79 were in the MP/EBV coinfection group. We found longer fever duration and higher CRP, IgA, IgG, interleukin-2 (IL-2), percentage of peripheral neutrophils levels, higher incidence of pulmonary consolidation and percentage of refractory MPP in coinfection group, when compared to those in MP group. In ROC curve analysis, IL-2 was useful for differentiating patients with coinfection from those with MP infection. Logistic regression analysis showed that the IL-2 ≥ 3.35 pg/ml (OR = 3.677) was a significant predictor regarding to MP/EBV coinfection. In conclusion, coinfection of EBV and MP poses a higher risk for prolonged symptoms. IL-2 could be used as a good predictor of coinfection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.