Observational studyMedicine2020
Contradictions between DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores with the severity of coronary lesion in acute coronary syndrome.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the correlation of contradiction between DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score with the severity of coronary lesion in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).In total, 458 patients with ACS after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who had tolerated 1-year uneventful dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were enrolled and divided into groups based on the Gensini score, number of stenosed vessels, and left main (LM) disease. Both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were calculated and the proportion of patients receiving conflicting recommendations from each score was compared among the groups.DAPT score as well as the proportion of patients with DAPT score ≥2 were associated with the Gensini score and the number of stenosed vessels. Similarly, PRECISE-DAPT score as well as the proportion of patients with PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 were associated with the Gensini score and the number of stenosed vessels. The proportion of patients with DAPT score ≥2 along with PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 were associated with Gensini score, but they had no significant association with the number of stenosed vessels (P = .006 and P = .075, respectively). None of those aforementioned items were associated with LM disease.The inconsistencies of DAPT scores and PRECISE-DAPT scores are frequent and associated with the severity of coronary disease, represented by the Gensini score. Appropriate clinical decisions should be individualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.