Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32311825›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2020

Performance of factor IX extended half-life product measurements in external quality control assessment programs.

Angelique Nederlof, Steve Kitchen, Piet Meijer, Marjon Cnossen, Nae Ali Pour, Geoffrey Kershaw, Ian Jennings, Isobel Walker, Moniek P M de Maat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Haematologica · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Extravascular factor IX after gene therapy in hemophilia B, does it matter?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nanomedicine Therapies for Pediatric Diseases.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Angelique NederlofDepartment of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Steve KitchenUKNEQAS BC, Sheffield, UK.
Piet MeijerECAT Foundation, Voorschoten, the Netherlands.
Marjon CnossenDepartment of Paediatric Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Nae Ali PourRCPAQAP, St. Leonards, Australia.
Geoffrey KershawInstitute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ian JenningsUKNEQAS BC, Sheffield, UK.
Isobel WalkerUKNEQAS BC, Sheffield, UK.
Moniek P M de MaatDepartment of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-334X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with hemophilia B are increasingly treated with extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) concentrates. For the laboratory, introduction of these EHL concentrates presents a major challenge. To understand the variation in FIX activity levels, all available diagnostic assays need to be directly compared.

methodsThe ECAT, UKNEQAS, and RCPAQAP have collaboratively performed a global survey to evaluate the quality of FIX measurements using FIX deficient plasma samples spiked with recombinant FIX (rFIX), rFIXFP, rFIXFc, and N9-GP to levels at typical FIX trough (6 IU/dL) and peak levels (60 IU/dL). Participants were asked to use their routine protocols, using one-stage assays (OSA) or chromogenic assays (CA).

resultsIn samples spiked with 6 IU/dL product, median (25%-75% range) FIX activity levels (OSA), were 8.0 IU/dL (7.0-9.2) for rFIX, 6.0 IU/dL (4.0-7.1) for rFIXFP, 6.6 IU/dL (5.5-8.0) for rFIXFc, and 4.9 IU/dL (3.5-8.4) for N9-GP. In samples spiked with 60 IU/dL, FIX activity levels measured (using OSA) was 63.0 IU/dL (59.9-67.0) for rFIX, 42.5 IU/dL (28.2-47.0) for rFIXFP, 50.0 IU/dL (45.0-55.0) for rFIXFc, and 34.0 IU/dL (24.8-67.5) for N9-GP. Considerable differences were observed between reagents for all samples. With CA, there was also quite some variation, but no differences between reagents.

conclusionLarge variation is observed in the measurement of FIX activity levels after administration of rFIX and EHL FIX products. For N9-GP, most silica-based assays show especially high levels. It is essential to standardize and improve reliability of measurements of these concentrates as diagnosis and treatment monitoring is based on these results.

Indexed as

Factor IXHemophilia BHalf-LifeHumansQuality ControlRecombinant ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsFactor IXRecombinant Proteinsextended half-life productsexternal quality controlfactor IXhemophilia Blaboratory diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID32311825
PMCPMC7496271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.